Wednesday, December 01, 2021

Biden leading all presidents in stock market performance (so far)

So far, Joe Biden leads all U.S. Presidents in stock-market performance.

We’re in the early days, of course. Biden hasn’t served a full year yet. And the market slide on Nov. 26, if sustained, could change the numbers rapidly.

But through Nov. 26, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index has advanced 20.74% under Biden (including dividends). Annualize that and you get a 24.84% rate of return.

Either the raw number or the annualized number would put Biden at the top of the charts. Preceding Biden, Bill Clinton was on top, at 17.49% per year. Barack Obama was second at 16.25% and Donald Trump third with 15.95%.

For these calculations I use the Standard & Poor’s 500 Total Return Index, measured from Inauguration Day to the last full day of a president’s term.

Some people say the starting point isn’t fair, since a new president influences policy and the public mood beginning on Election Day or even sooner.

But I think it’s the best method. After all, if an outgoing president invaded Cuba or imposed wage-and-price controls, that would move the markets, whether the new president agreed with the policy or not.

Presidential rankings

Here’s how Biden and the 15 previous presidents stack up, ranked by annualized stock market returns.

President       Cumulative Annualized
Joe Biden           20.74%   24.84%
Bill Clinton       263.72%   17.49%
Barack Obama       233.71%   16.25%
Donald Trump        80.76%   15.95%
Gerald Ford         42.53%   15.57%
Harry Truman       207.98%   15.56%
Dwight Eisenhower  217.15%   15.51%
Ronald Reagan      207.83%   15.08%
George H.W. Bush    73.13%   14.71%
Jimmy Carter        59.33%   12.40%
Franklin Roosevelt 300.95%   12.15%
Lyndon Johnson      73.17%   11.23%
John Kennedy        30.42%    9.82%
Richard Nixon       -3.50%   -0.64%
George W. Bush     -26.75%   -3.82%
Herbert Hoover     -77.09%  -30.82%

One conclusion that jumps out at you is Republicans and Democrats both have big winners and losers. The top three spots in the table are occupied by Democrats. But Democratic icon John Kennedy ranks near the bottom, as does Lyndon Johnson, architect of the Great Society programs.

Among Republicans, Donald Trump, Gerald Ford and Dwight Eisenhower have terrific numbers. But Richard Nixon, George W. Bush and Herbert Hoover bring up the rear – the only three with negative returns.

Studies by Ned Davis Research Inc. show that stocks have gained 7.98% per year under Democratic presidents, versus only 3.6% per year under Republican ones. However, inflation has been higher (4.22%) under Democrats than under Republicans (1.80%). So the inflation-adjusted gap is more modest.

Why it’s up

Why has Biden done so well, so far? Part of the answer is lucky timing. Scientists brought out a vaccine for Covid-19 shortly after he took office. That was a big plus for the markets.

Passage of an infrastructure bill also gave the stock market a shot in the arm. Spending on roads, bridges and internet superstructure should add to demand for many companies.

Biden’s polling numbers, however, hint that the market’s strength from January to November may not last. His approval rating lately has been near 43%, down from about 55% in the first days of his administration. Markets prefer strong presidents, regardless of party.

Looking ahead

Whether the market continues to perform well depends in part on unclogging the nation’s ports, combatting the current labor shortage and containing the latest variant of the coronavirus.

To tilt the odds in your favor, it may help to try to guess how Biden’s policies will affect the market in the next three years.

I believe Biden will continue to push vigorously for infrastructure spending, following up on passage of the recent infrastructure bill. Possible plays here include Sterling Construction Co. (STRL, Financial), Fluor Corp. (FLR, Financial) and Nucor Corp. (NUE, Financial).

He will, I believe, press for increasing access to health care, though nowhere near as fast as his party’s left wing wants. That bodes sell, I think, for pharmaceutical companies such as Merck & Co. Inc. (MRK, Financial) and Pfizer Inc. (PFE, Financial).

Biden’s reappointment of Jerome Powell as head of the Federal Reserve probably means that interest rates will rise, but slowly. That should help financial stocks, notably banks such as JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM, Financial) and Bank of America Corp. (BAC, Financial).

So far, Biden has continued Trump’s hard line on trade with China. Lately, JPMorgan has been writing that a thaw in the frosty U.S.-China trade relationship is less of a long shot than people think.

If they’re right, I think some beneficiaries could be agricultural commodity companies such as Archer Daniels Midland Co. (ADM, Financial), semiconductor makers like Apple Inc. (AAPL, Financial) and the big auto makers, including General Motors Co. (GM, Financial) and Ford Motor Co. (F, Financial).

-- John Dorfman is chairman of Dorfman Value Investments in Boston. His firm of clients may own or trade securities discussed in this column. He can be reached at jdorfman@dorfmanvalue.com.

Wednesday, October 13, 2021

10 Golden Rules

I[Stacy Johnson]'ve been offering financial advice professionally for many decades. I’m also a millionaire several times over.

During my time in the trenches, I’ve heard every conceivable piece of financial advice, acted on many and offered some of my own.

Following are the best of the best — a few simple sentences you can follow that will absolutely, positively make you richer.

1. Never spend more than you make, ever

When I was 10, I started cutting grass to earn money beyond my meager allowance. Minutes after earning my first buck, Mom was stuffing me in the car for a trip to the bank to open my first passbook savings account.

Fifty years later, priority one is still to put something aside from every paycheck and send out less than I bring in.

Of course, life being what it is, it hasn’t always worked out that way. But in general, getting richer every month is as simple as spending less than you make, and getting poorer is as simple as spending more than you make.

2. Avoid debt like the plague

Most people treat debt as if it’s a normal part of life. They divide it into categories like “good debt” and “bad debt.” They discuss it endlessly, as if it’s some mathematical mystery.

Debt is not complicated. Paying money to temporarily use other people’s money makes you poorer. Charging money to temporarily let other people use yours makes you richer.

Since paying interest makes you poorer, you only do it in two situations:
  • When you have to in order to survive
  • When you’ll earn more on what you’re financing than what you’ll pay to finance it
Unless borrowing is ultimately going to make you richer, don’t do it.

3. Buy when everyone’s freaking out, and sell when everyone thinks they can’t lose

Rich people ring the register when the economy is booming, but that’s not when they created their wealth.

You get richer by investing when nobody else will: when unemployment is high, the market is tanking, everybody’s freaking out, and there’s nothing but fear and misery on the horizon.

The cyclical nature of our economy all but ensures bad times will periodically occur, and human nature all but ensures that when bad times happen, most people will freeze like a deer in the headlights. But downturns are the time you’ve been saving for.

If you think the world is truly ending, buy canned food and a shotgun. If not, step up. As billionaire investor Warren Buffett famously advised, “Be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful.”

4. You can either look rich or be rich

When I worked as a Wall Street investment adviser, I quickly learned that people who have tons of money most often don’t look like it. They don’t have to.

So, who are the big shots wearing the fancy suits and driving the Porsches? Often it’s the people who make a living selling stuff to the rich people.

I can’t remember the last time I wore a fancy suit. I’ve never owned a new car, and I live in a house that’s worth about one-third of what I could afford.

Diverting your investable cash into things like cars, clothing, vacations and houses you can’t afford will make you look rich now, but prevent you from actually becoming rich later.

5. Live like you’ll die tomorrow, but invest like you’ll live forever

You should always strive to get as much out of life as you can each and every day. After all, you could die tomorrow.

But here’s the thing: You probably won’t. Put something aside so you can continue soaking up what life has to offer for as long as possible.

6. There are only 6 ways to get rich

The only ways to get rich:
  1. Marry money.
  2. Inherit money.
  3. Exploit a unique talent.
  4. Get exceedingly lucky.
  5. Own or lead a successful business.
  6. Spend less than you make and invest your savings wisely over long periods of time.
Even as you’re aiming for any of the first five, practice the last one and you’re guaranteed to become rich eventually.

7. The riskiest thing you can do is take no risk

Whether it’s money, love or life in general, if you want rewards, you have to take risks.

When it comes to money, taking risks means investing in things that can go down in value — like stocks, real estate or your own business. Can you get through life without taking risks? Sure, but as my dad was fond of saying, you’ll never get a hit from the dugout.

Riskier investments typically offer the chance for higher returns. And that extra return can make a world of difference to the size of your nest egg. If you invest $200 a month over 30 years and earn 12% annually, you’ll end up with hundreds of thousands of dollars more in retirement savings than if the same investment earns just 2% per year.

Taking a measured amount of risk is the difference between getting rich and getting by.

That being said, making risky bets is simply gambling. Take measured risks. Minimize risk by knowing as much as possible before investing, not putting all your eggs in one basket and learning from your mistakes. Or better yet, learn from someone else’s errors.

8. Never make your well-being someone else’s responsibility

If you need surgery, you have little choice but to trust your fate to a professional. But when it comes to your money, don’t ever turn over complete control to anyone.

Seeking advice is always a good idea. But no matter who that adviser is or how smart they are, your money is more important to you than it is to them. So, if you’re not doing everything yourself, at least understand exactly what’s going on.

Virtually anyone can learn to navigate their finances. If you can’t be bothered to take responsibility for your own money, just keep it in the bank. At least that way you won’t end up ripped off, broke and blaming someone else for your problems.

9. When it comes to information, less can be more

About 15 years ago, I put about $2,000 into Apple stock. I sold half of it a few years ago, then sold a little more a couple of years ago. But as I write this, my remaining shares are worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Had I been watching financial news every day and reacting to pundits and market gyrations, I’d have sold it all long ago and been kicking myself today.

If you want to be rich, buy into high-quality stocks and hold on to them for long periods of time. If you want to kick yourself, buy into high-quality stocks, then sell them at the drop of a hat based on something or someone you saw or read.

10. Time isn’t money, money is time

Whoever said “Time is money” had it backward. Time is the one nonrenewable resource you have. Once your time is up, it’s up.

So, the trick is to spend as much of your limited time as possible doing stuff you want to do, rather than working for other people doing stuff you have to do. Money is the resource that allows you to do this.

If you go to the mall and spend $200 on clothes, that’s $200 you could have invested. If you’d earned 12% compounded annually on that $200, in 30 years you’d have accumulated around $6,000. Ignoring inflation and assuming you could live on $3,000 a month in retirement, forgoing those clothes today means retiring two months earlier.

Of course, you must have clothes. But maybe you don’t need $200 worth, or maybe you could have gotten them for less.

It’s your choice: stuff today or time tomorrow. Those who choose the former often stay poor. Those who choose the latter often get rich. Which will you choose?

-- Stacy Johnson / the 5/20/18 version / a bit different from these 10 Golden Rules, though there is some overlap

Wednesday, September 29, 2021

Grantham forecasts the market

Renowned investor Jeremy Grantham (Trades, Portfolio) is doubling down on his bubble call, telling CNBC’s Wilfred Frost on Tuesday’s “Closing Bell” that the conditions in the stock market right now are even crazier than the periods leading up to the crashes of 1929 and 2000.

As a result, he cautioned that investors should consider “avoid[ing] the U.S. like the plague.”

“The value stocks outside the U.S. are not too bad,” Grantham said. “They are overpriced, but they are going to return over the next 10 years a positive return. Our forecast in the U.S. is for a negative return over the next seven years…I strongly believe that will be accurate.”

During the interview, the guru, who is one of the co-founders of GMO, also commented on the future of the green energy market as well as despaired over meme stocks, calling them a “travesty of serious investing.”

***

Despite his recent advice to “avoid the U.S. like the plague,” as of the end of the second quarter, GuruFocus portfolio data shows the guru’s five largest holdings were Microsoft Corp. (MSFT, Financial), UnitedHealth Group Inc. (UNH, Financial), Apple Inc. (AAPL, Financial), U.S. Bancorp (USB, Financial) and Oracle Corp. (ORCL, Financial).

Monday, September 20, 2021

Songs of Experience: Reminiscences of a Strategist

It was 35 years ago this month that I began my career on Wall Street. In thinking about those three-and-a-half decades, I decided to shift tack with today’s report and ask readers to indulge me as I ruminate about what I’ve learned during these decades. I am often asked about the influences that have shaped me and my career; and they take many forms—including the iconic investors for whom I’ve worked, the memorable books and research I’ve pored over countless times, and the most valuable lessons they’ve imparted along the way.

My favorite quip ever said about the stock market was by Sir John Templeton. I had the great pleasure of meeting John many years ago when he appeared as a guest on Wall $treet Week With Louis Rukeyser (more on that below), when I was a panelist. He perfectly summed up what really drives the stock market—notably not using a single word that isn’t directly tied to investors’ emotional state:

“Bull markets are born on pessimism, they grow on skepticism, they mature on optimism and they die on euphoria.”

Some of the messages imbedded in Templeton’s most famous quote—as well as in those below—are even more important to ponder given today’s lofty valuations and not-so-subtle signs of investor complacency. There is nothing wrong with rejoicing in bull markets; but we must always remember that they do eventually end, so heed the messages from some of the greats of finance.

It was 1986 …

Thanks to admittedly heavy doses of luck and right-place-right-time, I started my career working for the late-great Marty Zweig and his partner Ned Babbitt at Avatar Associates. Within my first week on the job—as a “portfolio assistant” (aka, grunt)—Marty gave me a book that I still have, and still recommend every time someone asks me about my favorite investing books. It’s a must read for anyone, like me, who understands that it’s psychology that best defines market behavior.

Reminiscences of a Stock Operator was written by Edwin LeFevre and was first published in 1923. It is a fictionalized biography of Jesse Livermore, an actual legendary trader and speculator of that era. Below are some of the most memorable passages from that dog-eared book sitting on my shelf:

Edwin LeFevre

“Fear and hope remain the same; therefore the study of the psychology of speculators is as valuable as it ever was. Weapons change, but strategy remains strategy, on the New York Stock Exchange as on the battlefield.”

“The sucker has always tried to get something for nothing, and the appeal in all booms is always frankly to the gambling instinct aroused by cupidity and spurred by a pervasive prosperity. People who look for easy money invariably pay for the privilege of proving conclusively that it cannot be found on this sordid earth.”

“Speculators buy the trend; investors are in for the long haul; ‘they are a different breed of cats.’ One reason that people lose money today is that they have lost sight of this distinction; they profess to have the long term in mind and yet cannot resist following where the hot money has led.”

“Never try to sell at the top. It isn’t wise. Sell after a reaction if there is no rally.”

“…there is nothing new in Wall Street. There can’t be because speculation is as old as the hills. Whatever happens in the stock market today has happened before and will happen again.”

Marty Zweig

When Marty sadly passed away in 2013, I wrote a tribute to him as one of these bi-weekly missives, which long-time readers may remember.

Marty may be most famous for perfectly calling the Crash of ’87 on precisely the Friday night before that fateful Monday, October 19, 1987 (“Black Monday”). He did so on the legendary PBS show Wall $treet Week With Louis Rukeyser—a show I would join as a regular panelist 10 years later. Some readers (let’s just say of the more “seasoned” variety) might remember that prescient conversation between Marty and Lou; and thanks to YouTube, anyone can watch it.

Marty is also famous for coining two phrases that have become ingrained in many investors’ heads: “Don’t fight the Fed” and “Never fight the tape.” Here is what he had to say about both; some of which were in his bestselling 1986 book Winning on Wall Street:

“In the stock market, as with horse racing, money makes the mare go.”

“Big money is made in the stock market by being on the right side of major moves. I don’t believe in swimming against the tide. The idea is to get in harmony with the market. It’s suicidal to fight trends. They have a higher probability of continuing than not.”

“It’s OK to be wrong; it’s unforgivable to stay wrong.”

“I measure what’s going on, and I adapt to it. I try to get my ego out of the way. The market is smarter than I am, so I bend.”

“Patience is one of the most valuable attributes in investing.”

Louis Rukeyser

I miss Marty every day. I also miss Lou Rukeyser, who not only single-handedly introduced me to the world of financial media; but gave me some of the sagest advice I’ve ever received. During the preamble to the very first interview I did with Lou in 1997, he asked about my parents and whether they were “financial folks,” to which I responded no. He then took my hands in his and said, “when you come out on set in 15 minutes to have our interview, get them to understand what you’re talking about.” I try to live those words every single day in my role at Schwab.

Lou was also known for his humorous monologues every Friday night, including some of his most memorable quips:

“In Wall Street, the only thing that’s hard to explain is next week.”

“I never make a prediction that can be proved wrong within 24 hours.”

“The best way to keep money in perspective is to have some.”

But the one I’ll never forget is what Lou said on the Friday immediately following the Crash of ’87:

“It’s just your money. It’s not your life. The figures on a broker’s report mean little compared to that. The people who loved you a week ago still love you today.”

Quintessential investing books

Throughout those early years in my career, I read many a classic investing tome written by true legends. I try to pick each of them up from time to time to separate myself from the often-manic noise of the day-to-day reading and research with which we’re all bombarded. Though not an exhaustive list, they include:

A Random Walk Down Wall Street by Burton G. Malkiel, first published in 1973
The Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham, first published in 1949
The Money Game by Adam Smith (pseudonym for George Goodman), first published in 1976
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds by Charles Mackay, first published in 1841
Against the Gods by Peter L. Bernstein, first published in 1996

I could fill dozens of pages with memorable quotes from these spectacular books; but in keeping with the themes around speculation, here are some of my favorites:

Burton G. Malkiel

“Forecasts are difficult to make—particularly those about the future.”

“It’s not hard to make money in the market. What is hard to avoid is the alluring temptation to throw your money away on short, get-rich-quick speculative binges. It is an obvious lesson, but one frequently ignored.”

“…there are four factors that create irrational market behavior: overconfidence, biased judgments, herd mentality, and loss aversion.”

“Human nature likes order; people find it hard to accept the notion of randomness. No matter what the laws of chance might tell us, we search for patterns among random events wherever they might occur—not only in the stock market but even in interpreting sporting phenomena.”

Benjamin Graham

“Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

“Abnormally good or abnormally bad conditions do not last forever.”

“You will be much more in control, if you realize how much you are not in control.”

“The investor’s chief problem—and even his worst enemy—is likely to be himself.”

“…while enthusiasm may be necessary for great accomplishments elsewhere, on Wall Street it almost invariably leads to disaster.”

“An investment operation is one which, upon thorough analysis, promises safety of principal and an adequate return. Operations not meeting these requirements are speculative.”

“If the reason people invest is to make money, then in seeking advice they are asking others to tell them how to make money. That idea has some element of naivete.”

Adam Smith (George Goodman)

“If you don’t know who you are, this is an expensive place to find out.”

“The first thing you have to know is yourself. A man who knows himself can step outside himself and watch his own reactions like an observer.”

“When the Rothschilds got the word about the battle of Waterloo—in the movie it was by carrier pigeon—they didn’t rush down and buy British consols, the government bonds. They rushed in and sold, and then, in the panic, they bought.”

“The irony is that this is a money game and money is the way we keep score. But the real object of the Game is not money, but it is the playing of the Game itself. For the true players, you could take all the trophies away and substitute plastic beads or whales’ teeth; as long as there is a way to keep score, they will play.”

Charles Mackay

“Men, it has been well said, think in herds. It will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.”

“Let us not, in the pride of our superior knowledge, turn with contempt from the follies of our predecessors. The study of the errors into which great minds have fallen in the pursuit of truth can never be uninstructive.”

Peter L. Bernstein

“Risk and time are opposite sides of the same coin, for if there were no tomorrow there would be no risk. Time transforms risk, and the nature of risk is shaped by the time horizon: the future is the playing field.”

“Time matters most when decisions are irreversible. And yet many irreversible decisions must be made on the basis of incomplete information.”

“We are prisoners of the future because we will be ensnared by our past.”

“The information you have is not the information you want. The information you want is not the information you need. The information you need is not the information you can obtain. The information you can obtain costs more than you want to pay.”

“You never get poor by taking a profit.”

“Vast ills have followed a belief in certainty.”

Bob Farrell

During my 13 years at Zweig/Avatar, I was on the “buy side” managing money; and was the recipient of most of traditional Wall Street’s vast amount of “sell side” research. I was an admirer of many seasoned investment strategists during that time; and it planted the seed that would eventually grow into the role I’ve had at Schwab for more than two decades. In addition to Marty giving me Reminiscences of a Stock Operator to read; he also pointed me to the work of Bob Farrell; who was Merrill Lynch’s chief stock market analyst and senior investment advisor for 45 years; having studied fundamental analysis under (Benjamin) Gramm and (David L.) Dodd.

Bob is immortalized by his rules of investing that are still quoted widely by investment professionals—and ring as true today as ever:

Markets tend to return to the mean over time.

Excesses in one direction will lead to an opposite excess in the other direction.

There are no new eras—excesses are never permanent.

Exponential rapidly rising or falling markets usually go further than you think, but they do not correct by going sideways.

The public buys the most at the top and the least at the bottom.

Fear and greed are stronger than long-term resolve.

Markets are strongest when they are broad and weakest when they narrow to a handful of blue-chip names.

Bear markets have three stages—sharp down, reflexive rebound and a drawn-out fundamental downtrend.

When all the experts and forecasts agree—something else is going to happen.

Bull markets are more fun than bear markets

Charles Schwab, the company

I left Zweig/Avatar in mid-1999 to join U.S. Trust, which was acquired by Charles Schwab a short 10 months later. That acquisition was part of the evolution of Schwab away from its discount brokerage heritage to its expansion into a wealth management and brokerage powerhouse. With that acquisition, as I often say, I was figuratively adopted by the parent company, and my role was born.

Chuck Schwab, the man

Chuck has had an extraordinary influence on me personally, and my career. His optimism is infectious, and his character unrivaled in our business. One of my all-time favorite sentiments expressed by Chuck was about his people:

“I consider my ability to arouse enthusiasm among my people the greatest asset I possess, and the way to develop the best that is in a person is by appreciation and encouragement. There is nothing else that so kills the ambitions of a person as criticism from superiors.”

“I have yet to find the person, however great or exalted his station, who did not do better work and put forth greater effort under a spirit of approval than he would ever do under a spirit of criticism.”

I have worked under Chuck’s spirit of approval and encouragement for more than 20 years; for which I’ll be eternally grateful.

Two years ago, Chuck wrote a deeply personal memoir. In Invested Chuck tells a “remarkable story of a company succeeding by challenging norms and conventions through decades of change.” I had the great honor of hitting the road with Chuck on his book tour after it was published. During those conversations on stages around the country—as well as our many conversations over the past two decades—there are facets to his character and beliefs that have always guided me as I’ve traversed my path at Schwab.

One of our shared beliefs is the inability to time markets with any precision. Too many investors believe the key to success is knowing what’s going to happen in the market, and then positioning accordingly. But the reality is that it’s not what we know that makes us successful investors; it’s what we do. In Invested, Chuck wrote:

“If I had learned anything after years in the business, it was how little I could ever know about what the market would do tomorrow.”

I especially loved how Chuck closed the final chapter of Invested:

“Business is a creative process. You move forward into the unknowable future, try new things, make discoveries along the way, and repeat. It’s all about learning and growth. It is why I love it and the free market of ideas that enables it and makes so many great new things possible. I like to say business is organic, like life itself, ever changing. It is the human spirit of curiosity and creativity brought to life, and why I am ever optimistic about the future.”

Well said, Chuck.

Relevance

I’ve written a number of reports recently that detail a growing set of risks with which the market is facing. They include the aforementioned speculative froth at various points this year—concentrated in a rotating crop of non-traditional market segments, like meme stocks, SPACs, non-profitable ‘tech’ stocks, cryptocurrencies, IPOs, etc. Drawdowns this year in those areas have ranged from -30% to -80%. Perhaps because many of these “micro bubbles” sit outside traditional benchmark indexes like the S&P 500 helps explain the relative resiliency of the market.

Other risks include stretched valuations; monetary and fiscal policy concerns; slowing growth and not-yet-transitory inflation; and the recent/ongoing deterioration in the stock market’s “internals” (breadth). In fact, for all the cheering about the S&P 500 not having had even a 5% drawdown this year; it might surprise readers to know that 86% of the index’s constituents have had at least a 10% correction this year.

As highlighted above via the words of investment legends, investors should be cognizant of heightened risks. Heed the risk/reward benefits of diversification (across and within asset classes) and rebalancing. Try to divine whether there is a gap between your financial risk tolerance and your emotional risk tolerance. Those gaps can be surprisingly wide and often only discovered during tumultuous market periods.

“Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

-- Liz Ann Sonders

Wednesday, August 25, 2021

5 Investing Basics from Ben Graham

The Intelligent Investor is considered to be the best book on value investing every written. The Fourth Edition, which contains Jason Zweig’s additional, more modern, commentary, is about 600 pages long.

It works best when investors dig into just a single chapter.

In the first chapter, Graham and Zweig both lay out 5 investing basics.

1.       A stock is not just a ticker. You actually own a business with underlying value.

2.       The stock market swings between bulls and bears. Have a plan.

3.       The future value of every investment is a function of its present price.

4.       You will be wrong. Have a “margin of safety.”

5.       Develop discipline and courage.

The fifth investing basic sounds so simple. Yet “discipline and courage” is the most difficult part about long-term investing.

-- Tracey Ryniec

add low, trim high

With regard to rebalancing, it’s one of the most beneficial disciplines in that it forces us to do what we know we’re supposed to do — add low, trim high. Notice I adjusted that from the classic “buy low, sell high” adage; which can infer an all-or-nothing strategy. Frankly, investors should never think of investing as either “get in” or “get out.” That is gambling on moments in time; while investing should always be a disciplined process over time.

- Liz Ann Sonders

Thursday, August 19, 2021

If You’re so Smart, Why Aren’t You Rich?

The most successful people are not the most talented, just the luckiest, a new computer model of wealth creation confirms. Taking that into account can maximize return on many kinds of investment.

The distribution of wealth follows a well-known pattern sometimes called an 80:20 rule: 80 percent of the wealth is owned by 20 percent of the people. Indeed, a report last year concluded that just eight men had a total wealth equivalent to that of the world’s poorest 3.8 billion people.

This seems to occur in all societies at all scales. It is a well-studied pattern called a power law that crops up in a wide range of social phenomena. But the distribution of wealth is among the most controversial because of the issues it raises about fairness and merit. Why should so few people have so much wealth?

The conventional answer is that we live in a meritocracy in which people are rewarded for their talent, intelligence, effort, and so on. Over time, many people think, this translates into the wealth distribution that we observe, although a healthy dose of luck can play a role.

But there is a problem with this idea: while wealth distribution follows a power law, the distribution of human skills generally follows a normal distribution that is symmetric about an average value. For example, intelligence, as measured by IQ tests, follows this pattern. Average IQ is 100, but nobody has an IQ of 1,000 or 10,000.

The same is true of effort, as measured by hours worked. Some people work more hours than average and some work less, but nobody works a billion times more hours than anybody else.

And yet when it comes to the rewards for this work, some people do have billions of times more wealth than other people. What’s more, numerous studies have shown that the wealthiest people are generally not the most talented by other measures.

What factors, then, determine how individuals become wealthy? Could it be that chance plays a bigger role than anybody expected? And how can these factors, whatever they are, be exploited to make the world a better and fairer place?

We finally get an answer thanks to the work of Alessandro Pluchino at the University of Catania in Italy and a couple of colleagues. These guys have created a computer model of human talent and the way people use it to exploit opportunities in life. The model allows the team to study the role of chance in this process.

The results are something of an eye-opener. Their simulations accurately reproduce the wealth distribution in the real world. But the wealthiest individuals are not the most talented (although they must have a certain level of talent). They are the luckiest. And this has significant implications for the way societies can optimize the returns they get for investments in everything from business to science.

Pluchino and co’s model is straightforward. It consists of N people, each with a certain level of talent (skill, intelligence, ability, and so on). This talent is distributed normally around some average level, with some standard deviation. So some people are more talented than average and some are less so, but nobody is orders of magnitude more talented than anybody else.

This is the same kind of distribution seen for various human skills, or even characteristics like height or weight. Some people are taller or smaller than average, but nobody is the size of an ant or a skyscraper. Indeed, we are all quite similar.

The computer model charts each individual through a working life of 40 years. During this time, the individuals experience lucky events that they can exploit to increase their wealth if they are talented enough.

However, they also experience unlucky events that reduce their wealth. These events occur at random.

At the end of the 40 years, Pluchino and co rank the individuals by wealth and study the characteristics of the most successful. They also calculate the wealth distribution. They then repeat the simulation many times to check the robustness of the outcome.

When the team rank individuals by wealth, the distribution is exactly like that seen in real-world societies. “The ‘80-20’ rule is respected, since 80 percent of the population owns only 20 percent of the total capital, while the remaining 20 percent owns 80 percent of the same capital,” report Pluchino and co.

That may not be surprising or unfair if the wealthiest 20 percent turn out to be the most talented. But that isn’t what happens. The wealthiest individuals are typically not the most talented or anywhere near it. “The maximum success never coincides with the maximum talent, and vice-versa,” say the researchers.

So if not talent, what other factor causes this skewed wealth distribution? “Our simulation clearly shows that such a factor is just pure luck,” say Pluchino and co.

The team shows this by ranking individuals according to the number of lucky and unlucky events they experience throughout their 40-year careers. “It is evident that the most successful individuals are also the luckiest ones,” they say. “And the less successful individuals are also the unluckiest ones.”

That has significant implications for society. What is the most effective strategy for exploiting the role luck plays in success?

Pluchino and co study this from the point of view of science research funding, an issue clearly close to their hearts. Funding agencies the world over are interested in maximizing their return on investment in the scientific world. Indeed, the European Research Council recently invested $1.7 million in a program to study serendipity—the role of luck in scientific discovery—and how it can be exploited to improve funding outcomes.

***

I dunno.  Bezos, Gates, Zuckerberg, Musk, Buffett (and the like) aren't exactly dummies.  But they're lucky they live in America I guess.

Tuesday, July 27, 2021

The Law of Fashion

The great philosopher John Locke brilliantly captured the way the world works. Little did he know that he would also explain how the stock market works, even though it barely existed when he came up with his philosophy. The stock market is driven by “the law of fashion, civil law and divine law.”

Law of fashion

We have participated in the stock market since 1980 and we know quite a bit of the history of the prior decades. Each decade seems to have its own law of fashion. This means a “general precept established by public opinion.” It is the heart and soul of what John Kenneth Galbraith called “financial euphoria.” In the 1960s, the space race encouraged excitement about “Go-Go” growth companies. In the early 1970s, it was a group of 50 stocks (the Nifty-Fifty) which seemed to grow consistently and were rewarded in the marketplace of investors with highly fashionable price-to-earnings (P/E) multiples.

By 1981, stocks had done horribly as inflation soared and fashion surrounded businesses which benefitted from inflation. Five of the six largest cap companies were oil stocks and energy made up 29.5% of the S&P 500 Index. Oil, real estate and gold enjoyed the favor coming from the “law of fashion.”

In 1998-2000, the Dotcom Bubble controlled what was fashionable in the aftermath of the establishment of the internet, capping an amazing decade of success. Energy got back on its horse from 2000-2011, as the financial crisis boiled and China’s growth dominated what was popular.

The last decade (2011-2020) has been the FAANG Era (Facebook (FB, Financial), Amazon (AMZN, Financial), Apple (AAPL, Financial), Netflix (NFLX, Financial) and Google/Alphabet (GOOG, Financial)(GOOGL, Financial)), as the dominant tech companies have reasserted themselves in the stock market. This is under the general precept that nothing can go wrong with them and how dependent we have all become on their products.

Civil law

Occasionally, the U.S. government decides to get involved in the stock market via “civil law.” The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 broke up Standard Oil in the early 1900s, regulated the railroads and the telephone behemoth (AT&T (T, Financial)), sued IBM (IBM, Financial) in the 1960s, Microsoft (MSFT, Financial) in the 1990s and is preparing to go after Amazon, Google, Apple, Facebook and others. Here is the chart of IBM in the aftermath of running into “civil law” in 1969, when the Justice Department sued them and sought to break them up:

We have a rule when it comes to civil law in the stock market. When Senator Elizabeth Warren and Senator Josh Hawley agree on something, expect there to be civil law problems for the targets of their jointly held ire. Did I forget to mention Lina Khan, the head of the Federal Trade Commission, who is coming after the FAANG companies?

Divine law

To us at Smead Capital Management, there are some divine laws which govern the stock market over long time periods.
  • Interest rates are like gravity to P/E ratios (Warren Buffett (Trades, Portfolio)).
  • Euphoric episodes end badly (Galbraith).
  • Cheap stocks outperform expensive stocks over long time periods (Benjamin Graham).
  • Performance is enhanced by buying extreme pessimism (John Templeton).
  • Every stock which goes up 10-fold had to double and quadruple first (Smead).
  • Young people who buy stocks on borrowed money lose (Edwin Lefevre-"Reminisces of a Stock Market Operator").
  • Most investors suffer stock market failure (Dalbar).
The goal of our work is to avoid getting stuck as fashion disappears. We have no urge for getting beat up by our companies suffering from civil law moving against them. We enjoy using these divine laws to run our portfolios. Thanks to John Locke, we hope to avoid stock market failure.

-- Smead Capital Management

Monday, May 17, 2021

Charlie Tian looks at Cathie Wood's fund

Starting this week, I will be writing a weekly column on the market. Over the years, I have put most of my effort into the technology side of GuruFocus, though I still wrote my book, "Invest Like a Guru." I have spent more time observing the market lately. I hope that by sharing my observations of the market, it will help our GuruFocus community. Please do follow me here on GuruFocus.com.

I cannot start this column by overlooking that the once red-hot ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK, Financial) dipped below $100 for the first time since last November. ARKK is now more than one-third below its peak of $156 a little over three months ago, back when its star manager, Cathie Wood, was everywhere on financial media and attracted a large group of followers into her funds. She was hailed by some as the new Warren Buffett (Trades, Portfolio).

If we look at ARKK's performance numbers today, it is still one of the best, if not the best, among all ETFs, mutual funds and hedge funds over the past 12-month, three-year and five-year periods. The chart below compares the performances of ARKK versus Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A, Financial)(BRK.B, Financial) over the past 12 months. ARKK still outperformed by more than 10%.

1392889215645167616.png

Unfortunately, the majority of the investors that own ARKK today are losing money because more than half of its assets flew into the fund over the past six months. In contrast, almost every one of the investors who bought Berkshire Hathaway over the past 12 months has made money.

That is the price you pay if you chase hot funds. Sometimes it is painful for the fund managers, too. They may have good track records, but they lost more money than they made.

This reminds me of Bruce Berkowitz (Trades, Portfolio), the manager of the Fairholme Fund (Trades, Portfolio). After his tremendous track record during the first decade of this century, he was named Morningstar Fund Manager of the Decade, was considered the new Buffett and had a large following on GuruFocus as well. Money poured into his fund. At the end of the first quarter of 2011, Fairholme Fund (Trades, Portfolio) had more than $20 billion under management. But with a few missteps with his stock picks and the headwind with value investing, most of those chasing the fund withdrew as they could not endure the loss. By 2018, Fairholme Fund (Trades, Portfolio)'s assets were less than $1 billion. Around 95% of the money was either lost or withdrawn. This is the history of the asset value in the Fairholme Fund (Trades, Portfolio).

1392895468207386624.png

The Cathie Wood phenomena is a lot more like the Janus Fund during the dotcom era of the 1990s. Heavily invested in technology stocks, Janus routinely led the list of the best mutual funds. Money poured in at the rate of $1 billion a day. Back then, $1 billion was a lot more money than it is today. Then the dotcom bubble burst, Janus Fund lost money in three consecutive years from 2000 to 2002 and ranked at the bottom of mutual funds. The investors who once were rushing into the funds were streaming out, and most of them lost money. The fund never bounced back.

Chasing hot funds never works. Sure, skill is needed in stock picking. That is why we have Warren Buffett (Trades, Portfolio). But most of the star managers became stars not because they are better at stock picking, but because they are the most aggressive person in their style of investing while that style has the wind at its back. But every once in a while, the direction of the wind changes. With the Covid-19 pandemic, technology stocks, especially those with hyper growth prospects, gained momentum and many saw their price multiplied in a matter of months. Cathie Wood owns a lot of them. About half of the stocks she owns are those of earningless hyper growth companies. She became the hero, but then the direction of the wind turned.

That was what happened to Janus Fund. This is what is happening to Cathie Wood, too.

I personally know a lot of people who bought ARKK. I surveyed them yesterday and every one of them lost money and about half of them sold at a loss. I wonder whether the size of ARKK will repeat that of Fairholme Fund (Trades, Portfolio) a decade ago.

But maybe it is time for Berkowitz's value approach to shine again. After more than a decade of underperformance and reaching the bottom at the second half of 2020, value stocks are coming back. It has outperformed since then, as shown in the chart below, which illustrate the difference in rolling five-year annualized return between Russell 1000 Value and Growth.

The pattern of the stock market from 2010 to 2020 looks a lot like what happened from 1990 to 2000. We know what happened to the Janus Fund. We have yet to see what will happen to Cathie Wood.

History does rhyme.

Wednesday, January 27, 2021

The GameStop Effect

(Reuters) - Retail traders chalked one up versus Wall Street on Wednesday as hedge funds took heavy losses on short positions in GameStop, and regulators and financial professionals called for more scrutiny of trading fueled by anonymous social media posts.

In the latest skirmish in a week-long battle between Wall Street and Main Street, funds sold long positions in stocks to pay for losses shorting Gamestop, contributing to a slide of more than 2% in Wall Street’s main indexes.[.N]

“We are moving to a world where ordinary folk have the same access as professionals and can come to the same conclusion or maybe the opposite,” technology investor Chamath Palihapitiya told CNBC. “The solution is more transparency on the institutional side, not less access for retail.”

The market turmoil caught the attention of the White House, with press secretary Jen Psaki saying President Joe Biden’s economic team - including Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen on her first full day on the job - was “monitoring the situation.”

Massachusetts state regulator William Galvin, called on NYSE to suspend GameStop for 30 days to allow a cooling-off period.

“This isn’t investing, this is gambling,” he said in an interview. “This is obviously contrived.”

Nasdaq chief Adena Friedman said exchanges and regulators should watch whether anonymous social media posts could be driving “pump and dump” schemes.

“If we see a significant rise in the chatter on social media ... and we also match that up against unusual trading activity, we will potentially halt that stock to allow ourselves to investigate the situation,” Friedman said on CNBC.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission said it was aware of the market volatility and working with fellow regulators to “assess the situation and review the activities of regulated entities, financial intermediaries, and other market participants.”

Reddit has not been contacted by authorities over stock surges driven by a message board on the platform, a spokeswoman said.

The war began when famed short seller Andrew Left of Citron Capital bet against GameStop and was met with a barrage of retail traders betting the other way.

Factbox: Stocks shunned by Wall Street surge as 'GameStop Effect' snowballs

White House monitoring situation involving GameStop, other firms

Citron has been a target for some on Reddit’s “Wallstreetbets” thread, where posts helped drive gains for several niche stocks.

Left said in a video post that Citron abandoned its bet against GameStop after the video game retailer’s value soared almost tenfold in a fortnight.

“I have respect for the market,” Left said in the post.

Melvin Capital Management closed out its short position in GameStop on Tuesday after taking a huge loss.

WINNERS AND LOSERS

Shares of GameStop surged 135% on Wednesday, bringing their gain since Jan. 12 to about 1,700% and ballooning its market capitalization to $24 billion.

U.S. shares of BlackBerry Ltd jumped 33%, bringing their gain in 2021 to 279%, while movie theater operator AMC surged 300% and is now up over 800% year to date.

Along with Finnish technology firm Nokia Oyj, those companies were among the most heavily traded, with Reddit threads humming with chatter about the stocks. Nokia said it was not aware of any reason for the continuing surge in its share price.

Such inflated stocks will eventually fall back to their fair value, predicted Ryan Detrick, senior market strategist at LPL Financial in Charlotte, North Carolina.

“It does have a David and Goliath feel, where the Reddit crowd is taking on the most shorted stocks by the largest hedge funds in the world and winning.”

BlackRock Inc, the world’s largest asset manager, could have made gains of about $2.4 billion on its investment in GameStop. Its share holdings amounted to roughly a 13% stake as of Dec. 31, 2020, a regulatory filing showed.

“It’s a dangerous game to play from both sides of the spectrum, whether you’re long or short,” said Matthew Keator, managing partner in wealth management firm the Keator Group in Lenox, Massachusetts.

“You get close enough to the fire you’re going to get burned ... it won’t matter what social media is cheering the stock on.”

According to research firm S3 Partners, total short interest in GameStop was $10.6 billion as of Wednesday. In the last seven days the short has increased by $117 million, or 1.1%, as the stock price surged.

Year-to-date, GameStop shorts have lost $19.15 billion, including $9.85 billion on Wednesday at a $285 share price, according to Ihor Dusaniwsky, S3’s managing director of predictive analytics.

“These large mark-to-market losses will be squeezing many existing shorts out of their positions, but we are still seeing new short sellers taking their place as they look to short at the top and ride a windfall of profits,” he said.

Long dismissed as “dumb money,” retail traders have made stocks move in ways that defy fundamental analysis. Global bets worth billions of dollars could be at risk as amateurs challenge bearish positions of influential funds.

The 20 small-cap Russell 2000 index companies with the biggest bearish bets against them have risen 60% on average so far this year, easily outperforming the market, a Reuters analysis of Refinitiv data shows.

Europe’s most-shorted stocks also saw big price swings on Wednesday.

Experts are debating whether these massive share moves should be considered ominous signs for the market.

Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian said the rise of retail investors is healthy, however.

“That’s the sentiment, the public doing what they feel has been done to them by institutions,” Ohanian said in a tweet on Wednesday.

Sunday, January 10, 2021

5 pieces of financial advice from Warren Buffett

“I will tell you how to become rich. Be fearful when others are greedy. Be greedy when others are fearful.” Most people chase what’s hot. As euphoria builds money pours in. Until it collapses. Buffett does exactly the opposite. He buys when most people are selling. And waits when most are buying. Incredibly difficult to do. And incredibly rewarding.

“Price is what you pay. Value is what you get. I like buying quality merchandise when it’s marked down.” Most people chase price. The higher the price the more money flows in. Until the value can’t sustain the price. Buffett chases value. Looks for investments priced under their worth. Then buys and waits for others to discover their value.

“I don’t look to jump over seven foot bars. I look for one foot bars I can step over.” Most people try to hit home-runs. They speculate on the next big hit. And keep striking out. Buffett instead invests to build wealth steadily. Rare home-runs. Lots of singles that win games.

“Successful investing takes time, discipline and patience.” Most people want to get rich quick. So they continually take long bets that frequently blow up. Buffett takes a long term view. He’s happy to build wealth over a lifetime rather than a year or decade.

“What we learn from history is that most people don’t learn from history.” Most people whether euphoric or depressed refuse to learn from those who were successful. And they pay the price. Buffett always learned from others. And reaped the rewards.

Saturday, January 09, 2021

move over Buffett?

"Move Over, Warren Buffett: This Is the Star Investor You Should Be Following."

So read the headline on a year-end article from retail investing advice site Motley Fool touting the performance of fund manager Cathie Wood. Variations on the "Buffett is done" theme have been around since at least the tech bubble, while the cult of star mutual-fund managers goes back to the 1960s. Such commentators have eventually eaten their words.

Not that Ms. Wood's performance is anything to sneeze at. Her largest exchange-traded fund, the ARK Innovation ETF, surged by almost 160% last year, growing assets 10-fold -- unprecedented inflows for an active fund of that type. She made concentrated bets on hot stocks such as Tesla, Roku, Square and biotechs boosted by the Covid-19 pandemic. An ARK Invest spokesperson wouldn't elaborate, but Ms. Wood told an interviewer last month that she expects to nearly triple unit holders' money over the next five years.

That is unlikely. In fact, similar star managers' performance has tended not only to be mean-reverting but actually worse-than-average after their runs end. Bill Miller, who famously beat the S&P 500 from 1991 through 2005, drawing huge inflows into Legg Mason Value Trust, spent the next few years as one of the worst fund managers in the country.

Come-uppances are especially harsh when a manager has ridden a hot category as Ms. Wood's firm has done. The fate of mutual-fund firm Janus is instructive: Between the end of 1998 and the end of March 2000, it went from being the 20th largest mutual-fund firm to the fifth largest -- an incredibly rapid ascent. It bet big on tech highfliers such as Cisco Systems and AOL. As the bubble burst, some of its funds lost two-thirds or more of their value.

Fund managers are often compared with dart-throwing monkeys. That might be too flattering for those who get the most attention. Hot funds' performance is often worse than random on the downside. A regularly updated study on the persistence of investor performance from S&P Dow Jones Indices shows that just 0.18% of domestic equity funds in the top quartile of performance in 2015 maintained that through each of the next four years -- less than half what one would have expected by pure chance. And of course most actively managed funds lag behind the index to which they are benchmarked because of fees and taxes.

This explains the amazing rise of index funds. It is mainly the supposed existence of stars such as Ms. Wood that has staved off an even bigger exodus from actively managed funds. Studies have shown, though, that actual stock-picking skill is very rare and is only provable after decades -- the sort of record that Mr. Buffett has established.

An academic study by Jerry Parwada and Eric Tan that examined the Morningstar Fund Managers of the Year between 1995 and 2012 showed that winners got big inflows but that their future performance was unremarkable. Indeed, one fund manager who later stumbled blamed the difficulty of deploying the extra cash for his poor results.

That makes sense. If one looks at Mr. Buffett, his results when he ran a modest partnership in the 1960s were far better than those of his huge, diversified conglomerate recently. But, unlike a share of Berkshire Hathaway, the dollar-weighted returns of a growing fund are worse than the stated results because more people are around for the stumble than the ascent.

Hot funds can burn you.

Thursday, January 07, 2021

Elon Musk

Elon Musk just became the richest person in the world, with a net worth of more than $185 billion.

Thursday’s increase in Tesla’s share price pushed Musk past Jeff Bezos, who had been the richest person since 2017 and is currently worth about $184 billion. Musk’s wealth surge over the past year marks the fastest rise to the top of the rich list in history — and is a dramatic financial turnaround for the famed entrepreneur who just 18 months ago was in the headlines for Tesla’s rapid cash burn and his personal leverage against the company’s stock.

Musk started 2020 worth about $27 billion, and was barely in the top 50 richest people.

Tesla’s rocketing share price — which has increased more than ninefold over the past year — along with his generous pay package have added more than $150 billion to his net worth.

Meanwhile, Amazon’s share price has remained more subdued due to the potential for increased regulation from Washington.

Elon Musk passed Warren Buffett in July to become the seventh-richest person. In November, Musk raced past Bill Gates to become the second-richest person. Musk has gained more wealth over the past 12 months than Bill Gates’ entire net worth of $132 billion.

Tesla’s shares closed Thursday at $816.04, up nearly 8%. The company’s market value has grown to more than $760 billion.