Showing posts with label strategy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label strategy. Show all posts

Monday, April 21, 2025

two-day plunges

After "Liberation Day" (April 2), in which President Donald Trump unveiled tariff rates far higher than virtually all investors suspected, the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) experienced a whopping 10.5% plunge.

That's the fourth-worst two-day plunge in the past 75 years. Not only that, the April downdraft came after the market had already been on a downward trajectory since mid-February.

The good news for investors? History suggests that this is likely a great time for long-term-oriented investors to buy.

According to Stansberry Research, the April 3-4 tumble is the fourth-worst two-day stretch in the market since 1950. Looking at the other top 10 two-day plunges, all occurred at the outset of genuine crises -- the 1987 "Black Monday" plunge, the Great Financial Crisis of 2008, and the outbreak of COVID-19 in 2020:

As you can see, following these two-day plunges, stocks exhibited mixed performance one, three, and even six months later, with positive average returns but also with a very wide skew. In fact, even after the two-day plunge that ended on Oct. 7, 2008, the market was 17.2% lower six months later.

However, when one looks out a year beyond these 10 other instances, the average return is a whopping 27.2%, with every single instance in the green and the biggest one-year recovery at 59.2%. Look two years out, and the average return is 40.4%, with gains as high as 69.5%.

Warren Buffett is famous for the quip, "Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful." Certainly, if the history of nauseating two-day drops is any guide, Buffett has historically been right on all counts.

But it's not just Buffett who has long touted the virtues of buying when others are selling and selling when everyone wants to buy. Buffett peer and Oaktree Capital founder Howard Marks, also a storied value investor, summed up the case nicely in his recent investment memo titled Nobody Knows (Yet Again).

In that memo, Marks notes how Oaktree went ahead and bought into both the 2008 financial crisis and the COVID-19 crisis, despite being highly uncertain about the future, unsure whether there would be further downside, and having no idea how or when the crises would end. All he knew was that financial assets were now heavily discounted.

The reason Marks takes a price-and-valuation-based approach and not one based on trying to game out future events is that:

We can't confidently predict the end of the world; we'd have no idea what to do if we knew the world would end; the things we'd do to gird for the end of the world would be disastrous if it didn't end; and most of the time the world doesn't end.

Buffett and Marks are, of course, not the first to espouse contrarian investing. After all, the phrase "Buy when there is blood in the streets" is attributed to 18th-century British nobleman Baron Rothschild, who coined the term after he bought into the panic following the Battle of Waterloo, which ultimately yielded him a fortune.

But there's also a case against buying today

Certainly, a lot of history suggests that buying into this market, while perhaps risky in the near term, is nearly certain to pay off in the long term. However, there are a couple of counter-narratives investors should be aware of that could make this time different.

First, the market is more expensive today than it was after those prior crashes. After the 1987 crash and the 2008 crash, the S&P 500 price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio was in the low- to mid-teens. In March 2020, the valuation was higher, in the low 20s. Today, the S&P 500 is around 26.9 times earnings.

While it's true that the average valuation of the market has been pushed up by the rise of the highly valued and heavily weighted "Magnificent Seven" stocks in recent years, the higher valuation on a historical basis means investors might not enjoy such historically robust post-drop returns from here.

Second, the implementation of tariffs, unlike these other instances, risks pushing up inflation, which may tie the hands of the Federal Reserve. Remember, the Fed responded to Black Monday, the 2008 Financial Crisis, and the COVID crisis by lowering interest rates. The Fed even went so far as to cut the Federal Funds rate to zero in 2008 and 2020 while also purchasing longer-term U.S. Treasuries, which kept rates low to stimulate the economy.

In recent days, various Fed officials have stated publicly that since tariff policies could drive up inflation, the Federal Reserve may be more limited in its ability to provide monetary stimulus this time. And whereas the Federal government in 2008 and 2020 was doing everything it could to help the situation, today the problem has actually been caused by the government, at least the Executive branch, which is still in the beginning of its four-year term.

But don't be paralyzed; stick with your plans

So, for all these reasons, it's quite possible that the market could experience further downside from here. On the other hand, the current administration also has more ability to rectify the situation than the administrations during those other market downturns, since it's also the entity that ignited this particular market crash in the first place.

All in all, if you do have investable dollars and engage in regular stock buys or 401(k) or IRA contributions, there's no reason not to invest today as long as it's within your financial plan and risk tolerance. As history has shown, times of great uncertainty are often the very best times to purchase stocks.

That said, the differences between the current crisis and 1987, 2008, and 2020 keep this investor somewhat cautious. Therefore, investors may want to think twice before committing heavily to stock-buying and/or using leverage to do so.

Tuesday, April 15, 2025

Investing is hard

Have you ever noticed the contradictions in our “wisest” investment slogans?

Is it…

“Let your winners run” or “Little pigs get big, but big pigs get slaughtered”?

“Cut your losers short” or “Time in the market beats timing the market”?

“Be greedy when others are fearful” or “Never catch a falling knife”?

“Stick to your investment plan” or “When the facts change, I change my mind”?

There will always be an investment maxim that, in hindsight, will have been the “wise” path you should have taken (usually quoted to you by a 23-year-old, wet-behind-the-ears recent hire at a brokerage firm).

You know that stock you sold when it fell 20%, triggering your stop-loss?

When it reverses and turns into a 300% winner, you should have known that…

“The stock market is designed to transfer money from the active to the patient,” as Warren Buffett once said.

But when you hold onto that other 20% loser in your portfolio – only for it to collapse 85% and never recover – you should have known that…

“Selling your winners and holding your losers is like cutting the flowers and watering the weeds,” as Warren Buffett once wrote.

(Technically, this comes from Peter Lynch, but Buffett liked the quote so much that he included it in one of his year-end reports to shareholders.)

Bottom line: Investing is hard.


more from the same article...

About a decade ago, the research shop Longboard studied the total lifetime returns for individual U.S. stocks from 1983 through 2006.

They found that the worst-performing 6,000 stocks – which represented 75% of the stock-universe in the study – collectively had a total return of… 0%.

The best-performing 2,000 stocks – the remaining 25% – accounted for all the gains.

Here’s Longboard on the takeaway:

The conclusion is that if an investor was somehow unlucky enough to miss the 25% most profitable stocks and instead invested in the other 75% his/her total gain from 1983 to 2006 would have been 0%.

In other words, a minority of stocks are responsible for the majority of the market’s gains.

[then they go into their salespitch of course]

Tuesday, June 25, 2024

Signs that you're wealthy

It’s easy to feel like you’re behind when your social media feeds are filled with friends taking lavish vacations and buying new cars. But your financial fitness may be better than you realize — even if your wallet isn’t bulging.

Contrary to how it may seem on the surface, being wealthy isn’t always signified by the stuff you have, the size of your home, or the label on your jeans. True financial freedom is harder to spot.

Once you stop focusing on traditional markers of wealth, you begin to see how rich you really are. Here are a few signs that you’re well-off that you’re probably overlooking.

1.  You save money

With 61% of Americans living paycheck to paycheck, the ability to save a few bucks each week puts you ahead of most people. 

If you consistently keep more cash in your wallet with every paycheck, you’re increasing the distance between you and disaster, and you're well on your way to financial security.

2.  You invest

Your money can work harder for you than you ever can for it. By investing, you’re putting those dollars to work, gathering interest and appreciation. 

Deciding to start investing in stocks and bonds is how many millionaires achieve their wealth, though some invest in a business (their own or those of others) to generate income as well.

3.  You live comfortably below your means

Ironically, contentment with your income and the ability to live within it is another sign of being well off. This liberates you from the constant need to earn and spend more. 

By spending less than you earn, you’ll ensure your wealth is long-lasting and won’t be threatened by the next economic downturn.

4.  You can buy the things you want, even if you have to save

The one-percenters have an easy time forking out for a boat or a vacation to Paris, no question about it. But if you can afford the same luxuries after a few years of mindful spending and careful saving, you’re still enjoying the same level of luxury, if not as often.

5.  You can afford to retire on time

Sadly, one in five Americans believe they’ll never be able to retire. If you’re on track to retire in your 60s (or retire early), you’re one of the lucky ones. The ability to stop working and enjoy your golden years is truly enviable.

6.  You can consider other things besides money in decision-making

Those with means can consider convenience, sustainability, style, and other factors when making purchases, not just the price. 

It’s odd, but when it’s not all about the money, that’s when you’re in the money. If money isn’t the only driver behind your decisions, you likely have plenty of it.

7.  You spend on things that give you back time

Whether it’s a housecleaner, a landscaper to mow your yard, or even a dishwasher, the fact that you can invest in products and services that aren’t necessities but save you time makes you an affluent person.

Unlike money, no person alive can ever get more than 24 hours in a day. Rich people know that time is a more precious resource than money, and they spend both accordingly.

8.  You’re not being pulled down by debt

Americans paid nearly $164 billion in credit card interest and fees in 2022. 

If you’ve managed to pay off any debts you’ve had, you’re at least richer than the average person. That excludes student loans, car notes, and other debt. Wealthy folks know the value of collecting interest, not paying it.

9.  You invest in yourself

Your library of knowledge is one of the most productive investments you can make, though it doesn’t come cheap. You're certainly well off if you can afford the money and time for good books, courses, seminars, and other learning materials.

10.  Your net worth is increasing

Where you’re going is arguably more important than where you’ve been. If your net worth — the difference between the value of the assets you own and the liabilities you owe — is positive and growing, you’re on the right path.

11.  You’re able to look past the price

If you can buy things with quality and price of ownership in mind (rather than getting the cheapest item that fits the bill because it’s all you can afford), that’s a sign you’re financially well off.

It’s sad and ironic that those with more money tend to get better bargains because they can make larger one-time purchases to get bulk deals or buy quality products that last.

12.  You have peace of mind

Knowing you and your loved ones are covered with life, health, home, and auto insurance in case disaster strikes allows you to sleep better at night. 

Insurance can protect you from a black swan event, wiping out the wealth you’ve worked hard to build.

13.  You have a strong network

Another non-monetary indicator of wealth is in the people around you. If you have a strong network of friends and family to check in on you and help you during hard times, then you are wealthy.

14.  You share time and money with others

Perhaps the most significant sign of wealth is the ability to give it away. Giving money to a church, charity, non-profit, or other worthy cause brings meaning and purpose behind having it in the first place. And since time is money, volunteering your time counts, too.

15.  You partake in activities that have meaning to you

One of life’s most lavish luxuries is spending time on things that bring you joy. 

Whether you step up your travel game, enjoy woodworking, write music, or help at a soup kitchen, having the time and money to pursue things other than money is a subtle sign of affluence.

Bottom line

Saving, investing, giving a little money to charity, and enjoying a few of life’s pleasures are all signs of financial fitness.

Those things aren’t easily detectable via labels and Instagram photos, but they are some of the best things money can buy.

Tuesday, January 16, 2024

The Seven Virtues of Great Investors

I started reading Morgan Housel's Psychology of Money because it was recommended by my Kindle.  I can give no higher recommendation than that I am continuing to read it.  I borrowed it on Libby, but it's one of those books that I would actually buy!

Anyway, on the cover is a blurb by Jason Zweig, "one of the best and most original finance books in years".

Zweig is a columnist for the Wall Street Journal and I googled him.  Turns out he has a blog and one of the blog entries is The Seven Virtues of Great Investors.  I'm reading it and it sounds OK to me (but it's not as interesting as Housel's book).

Friday, March 03, 2023

Bob Farrell's 10 Rules

Who is Bob Farrell?

Twelve years after the conclusion of the Second World War, Bob Farrell started his career at Merrill Lynch as a technical analyst. Before kickstarting his illustrious career at Merrill Lynch, Farrell studied at the prestigious Columbia business school under Benjamin Graham and David Dodd. Graham and Dodd are widely hailed as the “godfathers of modern value investing” and are best known for their best-selling book “Security Analysis,” which was first published in 1934. In fact, Graham and Dodd are so synonymous with value investing that Warren Buffett (also a student of Graham at Columbia) attributes much of his success to the classic work and teachings of the two value investing legends.

A Wall Street Pioneer

While Mr. Farrell was educated under the value investing umbrella, he found his niche and success on Wall Street at the intersection of technical analysis, sentiment, and market psychology. Though this type of analysis was considered unconventional and even frowned upon at the onset of his career, by the end of Farrell’s nearly five-decade run on Wall Street, it had become mainstream. Farrell became so respected in market circles that his daily newsletter was read by several of the world’s sharpest money managers, including the likes of multi-billionaire George Soros. There is little Mr. Farrell hasn’t seen or experienced throughout his career. Below are Farrell’s 10 Rules:

1.   Markets tend to revert to the mean over time. Like a rubber band stretched in one direction, markets tend to snap back to the other direction eventually.

2.   Excesses in one direction will lead to an opposite excess in the other direction. Think about the internet boom and bust. At one point, stocks like Pets.com would rocket 200% in a single trading session just because they had “.com” in the name. During 2000-2003, the market unraveled just as violently in the opposite direction. The COVID-19 crash and subsequent rally afterward is another prime example:

3.   There are no new eras – excesses are never permanent. History is littered with boom-and-bust periods – nothing lasts forever. The great “Tulip Mania” of the 17th century, the dot com bust of 2000, and the 2008 housing debacle personify this rule.

4.   Exponential rapidly rising or falling markets usually go further than you think, but they do not correct by going sideways. The meme craze that occurred a few years ago is a good illustration of this rule. In 2020, GameStop (GME - Free Report) ran from $1 to $5.50 in five months. After more than a 500% move in such a short time, that wasn’t the end. The following month, shares soared 1600% to $120 a share before correcting to their current price of $18 per share.

5.   The public buys the most at the top and the least at the bottom. Most investors let their emotions get the best of them. Generally, if the public invested when they were most fearful and sold when they were most giddy, they would be much more profitable. In late 2022, most sentiment gauges showed fear. Over the next few months, the market went on a tear.

6.   Fear and greed are stronger than long-term resolve. The fast-moving pace of Wall Street can wreak havoc on investor emotions. When the opening bell rings and real money is on the line, it is akin to having a volume dial on emotions for most investors. The lack of discipline to create and stick to a well thought out investing plan can be detrimental to investors. Even if a well-thought-out plan is created, execution always supersedes intentions.

7.   Markets are strongest when they are broad and weakest when they narrow to a handful of blue-chip names. A “blue chip” is a well-established mega-cap company such as Apple (AAPL - Free Report) . Breadth refers to the number of stocks participating in a rally. The participation gauge is an important measure to follow because it can provide clues to a market breakdown prior to it occurring. In early 2021, Apple and other mega-cap blue chip stocks continued higher as the market began to stall slightly – a subtle, early caution flag for savvy investors who were paying attention.

8.   Bear markets have three stages – sharp down, reflexive rebound, and a drawn-out fundamental downtrend. Because the public typically buys the dip at the wrong time or shorts “in the hole” when stocks have already moved down rapidly, equity markets usually have a violent “bear market rally” before trending lower.

9.   When all the experts and forecasts agree – something else is going to happen. Contrarian, independent thinking is the clearest path to success on Wall Street. Following the Global Financial Crisis, David Tepper bought Bank of America (BAC - Free Report) in 2009. Later when he recounted the trade, he said, “I felt like I was alone”. The trade ended up netting him $4 billion. To achieve outstanding results, you must think differently.

10.  Bull markets are more fun than bear markets! While making money in a down market can be done, bull markets are much more forgiving. Who can argue this?

Conclusion

Over Farrell’s 45-year career at Merrill Lynch, he saw bull markets, bear markets, and everything in between. While investors can educate themselves by reading books or attending seminars, nothing beats decades of seat time. Through his successful and deep experience, Farrell’s rules challenge investors to study history, the madness of crowds, and their inherent “humanness” and emotions.

Sunday, August 14, 2022

what the Volcker era teaches us now

When inflation soared 40 years ago, people with patience came out fine.

The cost of living is sky-high, and Jerome H. Powell, the chair of the Federal Reserve, says that battling it is his highest priority. He has raised interest rates to damp down inflation, which hit its highest point in 40 years. Financial markets don’t know quite how to react.

Something similar happened the last time inflation was out of control. Paul A. Volcker was the Fed chair then. He wrung inflation out of the economy, but at a great cost — hurling the nation into not just one recession, but two. Unemployment soared, stocks fell repeatedly, interest rates oscillated and, for a while, bonds looked shaky, too.

It’s worth looking at his era for guidance. 

First, because it had multiple, severe downturns, the Volcker era was disastrous for anyone who traded actively and bet wrong on the direction of the markets. Short-term trading is especially dangerous when the market’s currents are opaque and treacherously strong, as they were back then and may be now.

But, second, the Volcker era was wonderful for those with the patience and resources to ride it out. While Mr. Volcker’s stern treatment of the economy was deliberately disruptive, it ushered in awesome bull markets, in both stocks and bonds.

When Mr. Volcker became Fed chair in 1979, inflation was running above 11 percent annually, and the unemployment rate was almost 6 percent. A bull market in stocks had started in 1974 and it continued months more, even though the Volcker Fed had begun to tighten monetary policy.

On Saturday, Oct. 6, 1979, Mr. Volcker announced that, “No longer would the Federal Reserve set interest rates to guide policy,” Jeremy J. Siegel, the University of Pennsylvania economist, wrote in the book “Stocks for the Long Run.” “Instead, it would exercise control over the supply of money without regard to interest rate movements.”

By reducing the money supply, and letting short-term interest rates float, the Fed was, effectively, letting rates spiral upward.

“Stocks went into a tailspin, falling almost 8 percent on record volume in the 2½ days following the announcement,” Professor Siegel wrote. “Stockholders shuddered at the prospect of sharply higher interest rates that would be necessary to tame inflation.”

By March 1980, the Fed funds rate was an astonishing 17 percent, compared with just 2.5 percent today. It would exceed 19 percent the following year.

The economy slowed so much that it fell into a recession from January through July 1980.

But it wasn’t until Nov. 28, 1980, that a bear market in stocks began.

The S& P 500 lost more than 27 percent during a miserable 20-month period that ended in August 1982. If you were on the wrong side of that move, you lost a ton of money. The second Volcker recession began in July 1981 and lasted until November 1982.

If you hung in during the entire Volcker era, you experienced turmoil but went on to enormous gains in both stocks and bonds. From the day Mr. Volcker took office until the day he left in 1987, shares in the Vanguard S& P 500 stock index fund — the first lowcost broad index fund available to ordinary investors — would have gained 215 percent, according to FactSet data.

An index of the broad bond market, now known as the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate, would have gained 143 percent in that period. And on the day Mr. Volcker started as Fed chair, the 30-year U.S. Treasury bond provided a yield of more than 9 percent — a guaranteed doubling of your money every eight years, if you had just held onto it. Even better, you could have bought a Treasury bond in September 1981 that paid a guaranteed 15.19 percent for 30 years.

There were big ups and downs in shorter stretches. They scared me away from stocks for a while.

What we’ve been experiencing over the last year is frightening, too. It’s not clear whether the July rally in the stock market was more like an early sucker’s rally in the Volcker era (leading to a recession and bear market) or like the second big rally — the one that became a great bull market. Or, perhaps, it’s another variation.

No one knows. But remember that those long-term bets on stocks and bonds paid off, even in that era of market turmoil.

- Jeff Sommer, New York Times (via Honolulu Star-Advertiser, 8/14/22)

Thursday, February 24, 2022

Dogbert the financial expert

2/24/22 - where to put your money
2/23/22 - what's the best way to make money in today's market?
2/22/22 - advice for people who are new to investing
2/21/22 - what should investors do in the coming year?

and more

Monday, January 24, 2022

pullbacks and corrections

Stocks closed lower on Friday and for the week. That makes it three weeks in a row.

Rough start to the new year.

The Dow and the S&P remain in 'pullback' territory (-7.27% and -8.73% respectively). And the Nasdaq remains in 'correction' territory (-15.1%).

Pullbacks, which are defined as a decline between -5% and -9.99%, happen on average of 3-4 times a year.

And corrections, which are defined as a decline between -10% and -19.99%, happen roughly once a year.

The Dow and the S&P pulled back 3 times last year. But ultimately gained 18.7% and 26.9% for the year.

The Nasdaq corrected once last year, and finished with a gain of 21.4%.

So what we're seeing right now is not unusual. In fact, pullbacks and corrections are common.

Every bull market has them.

While they're never fun when they're happening, if you know these are commonplace moves, you can instead look at them as opportunities to buy rather than places to sell.

For me, each additional step back means we are getting closer to the pullback/correction being over. Not to mention the opportunity of getting in at even cheaper prices.

And the sooner we can get this over with, the sooner we can get back to the bull market rally.

Kevin Matras
Executive Vice President, Zacks Investment Research

- Profit from the Pros (1/24/22)

Wednesday, October 13, 2021

10 Golden Rules

I[Stacy Johnson]'ve been offering financial advice professionally for many decades. I’m also a millionaire several times over.

During my time in the trenches, I’ve heard every conceivable piece of financial advice, acted on many and offered some of my own.

Following are the best of the best — a few simple sentences you can follow that will absolutely, positively make you richer.

1. Never spend more than you make, ever

When I was 10, I started cutting grass to earn money beyond my meager allowance. Minutes after earning my first buck, Mom was stuffing me in the car for a trip to the bank to open my first passbook savings account.

Fifty years later, priority one is still to put something aside from every paycheck and send out less than I bring in.

Of course, life being what it is, it hasn’t always worked out that way. But in general, getting richer every month is as simple as spending less than you make, and getting poorer is as simple as spending more than you make.

2. Avoid debt like the plague

Most people treat debt as if it’s a normal part of life. They divide it into categories like “good debt” and “bad debt.” They discuss it endlessly, as if it’s some mathematical mystery.

Debt is not complicated. Paying money to temporarily use other people’s money makes you poorer. Charging money to temporarily let other people use yours makes you richer.

Since paying interest makes you poorer, you only do it in two situations:
  • When you have to in order to survive
  • When you’ll earn more on what you’re financing than what you’ll pay to finance it
Unless borrowing is ultimately going to make you richer, don’t do it.

3. Buy when everyone’s freaking out, and sell when everyone thinks they can’t lose

Rich people ring the register when the economy is booming, but that’s not when they created their wealth.

You get richer by investing when nobody else will: when unemployment is high, the market is tanking, everybody’s freaking out, and there’s nothing but fear and misery on the horizon.

The cyclical nature of our economy all but ensures bad times will periodically occur, and human nature all but ensures that when bad times happen, most people will freeze like a deer in the headlights. But downturns are the time you’ve been saving for.

If you think the world is truly ending, buy canned food and a shotgun. If not, step up. As billionaire investor Warren Buffett famously advised, “Be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful.”

4. You can either look rich or be rich

When I worked as a Wall Street investment adviser, I quickly learned that people who have tons of money most often don’t look like it. They don’t have to.

So, who are the big shots wearing the fancy suits and driving the Porsches? Often it’s the people who make a living selling stuff to the rich people.

I can’t remember the last time I wore a fancy suit. I’ve never owned a new car, and I live in a house that’s worth about one-third of what I could afford.

Diverting your investable cash into things like cars, clothing, vacations and houses you can’t afford will make you look rich now, but prevent you from actually becoming rich later.

5. Live like you’ll die tomorrow, but invest like you’ll live forever

You should always strive to get as much out of life as you can each and every day. After all, you could die tomorrow.

But here’s the thing: You probably won’t. Put something aside so you can continue soaking up what life has to offer for as long as possible.

6. There are only 6 ways to get rich

The only ways to get rich:
  1. Marry money.
  2. Inherit money.
  3. Exploit a unique talent.
  4. Get exceedingly lucky.
  5. Own or lead a successful business.
  6. Spend less than you make and invest your savings wisely over long periods of time.
Even as you’re aiming for any of the first five, practice the last one and you’re guaranteed to become rich eventually.

7. The riskiest thing you can do is take no risk

Whether it’s money, love or life in general, if you want rewards, you have to take risks.

When it comes to money, taking risks means investing in things that can go down in value — like stocks, real estate or your own business. Can you get through life without taking risks? Sure, but as my dad was fond of saying, you’ll never get a hit from the dugout.

Riskier investments typically offer the chance for higher returns. And that extra return can make a world of difference to the size of your nest egg. If you invest $200 a month over 30 years and earn 12% annually, you’ll end up with hundreds of thousands of dollars more in retirement savings than if the same investment earns just 2% per year.

Taking a measured amount of risk is the difference between getting rich and getting by.

That being said, making risky bets is simply gambling. Take measured risks. Minimize risk by knowing as much as possible before investing, not putting all your eggs in one basket and learning from your mistakes. Or better yet, learn from someone else’s errors.

8. Never make your well-being someone else’s responsibility

If you need surgery, you have little choice but to trust your fate to a professional. But when it comes to your money, don’t ever turn over complete control to anyone.

Seeking advice is always a good idea. But no matter who that adviser is or how smart they are, your money is more important to you than it is to them. So, if you’re not doing everything yourself, at least understand exactly what’s going on.

Virtually anyone can learn to navigate their finances. If you can’t be bothered to take responsibility for your own money, just keep it in the bank. At least that way you won’t end up ripped off, broke and blaming someone else for your problems.

9. When it comes to information, less can be more

About 15 years ago, I put about $2,000 into Apple stock. I sold half of it a few years ago, then sold a little more a couple of years ago. But as I write this, my remaining shares are worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Had I been watching financial news every day and reacting to pundits and market gyrations, I’d have sold it all long ago and been kicking myself today.

If you want to be rich, buy into high-quality stocks and hold on to them for long periods of time. If you want to kick yourself, buy into high-quality stocks, then sell them at the drop of a hat based on something or someone you saw or read.

10. Time isn’t money, money is time

Whoever said “Time is money” had it backward. Time is the one nonrenewable resource you have. Once your time is up, it’s up.

So, the trick is to spend as much of your limited time as possible doing stuff you want to do, rather than working for other people doing stuff you have to do. Money is the resource that allows you to do this.

If you go to the mall and spend $200 on clothes, that’s $200 you could have invested. If you’d earned 12% compounded annually on that $200, in 30 years you’d have accumulated around $6,000. Ignoring inflation and assuming you could live on $3,000 a month in retirement, forgoing those clothes today means retiring two months earlier.

Of course, you must have clothes. But maybe you don’t need $200 worth, or maybe you could have gotten them for less.

It’s your choice: stuff today or time tomorrow. Those who choose the former often stay poor. Those who choose the latter often get rich. Which will you choose?

-- Stacy Johnson / the 5/20/18 version / a bit different from these 10 Golden Rules, though there is some overlap

Monday, September 20, 2021

Songs of Experience: Reminiscences of a Strategist

It was 35 years ago this month that I began my career on Wall Street. In thinking about those three-and-a-half decades, I decided to shift tack with today’s report and ask readers to indulge me as I ruminate about what I’ve learned during these decades. I am often asked about the influences that have shaped me and my career; and they take many forms—including the iconic investors for whom I’ve worked, the memorable books and research I’ve pored over countless times, and the most valuable lessons they’ve imparted along the way.

My favorite quip ever said about the stock market was by Sir John Templeton. I had the great pleasure of meeting John many years ago when he appeared as a guest on Wall $treet Week With Louis Rukeyser (more on that below), when I was a panelist. He perfectly summed up what really drives the stock market—notably not using a single word that isn’t directly tied to investors’ emotional state:

“Bull markets are born on pessimism, they grow on skepticism, they mature on optimism and they die on euphoria.”

Some of the messages imbedded in Templeton’s most famous quote—as well as in those below—are even more important to ponder given today’s lofty valuations and not-so-subtle signs of investor complacency. There is nothing wrong with rejoicing in bull markets; but we must always remember that they do eventually end, so heed the messages from some of the greats of finance.

It was 1986 …

Thanks to admittedly heavy doses of luck and right-place-right-time, I started my career working for the late-great Marty Zweig and his partner Ned Babbitt at Avatar Associates. Within my first week on the job—as a “portfolio assistant” (aka, grunt)—Marty gave me a book that I still have, and still recommend every time someone asks me about my favorite investing books. It’s a must read for anyone, like me, who understands that it’s psychology that best defines market behavior.

Reminiscences of a Stock Operator was written by Edwin LeFevre and was first published in 1923. It is a fictionalized biography of Jesse Livermore, an actual legendary trader and speculator of that era. Below are some of the most memorable passages from that dog-eared book sitting on my shelf:

Edwin LeFevre

“Fear and hope remain the same; therefore the study of the psychology of speculators is as valuable as it ever was. Weapons change, but strategy remains strategy, on the New York Stock Exchange as on the battlefield.”

“The sucker has always tried to get something for nothing, and the appeal in all booms is always frankly to the gambling instinct aroused by cupidity and spurred by a pervasive prosperity. People who look for easy money invariably pay for the privilege of proving conclusively that it cannot be found on this sordid earth.”

“Speculators buy the trend; investors are in for the long haul; ‘they are a different breed of cats.’ One reason that people lose money today is that they have lost sight of this distinction; they profess to have the long term in mind and yet cannot resist following where the hot money has led.”

“Never try to sell at the top. It isn’t wise. Sell after a reaction if there is no rally.”

“…there is nothing new in Wall Street. There can’t be because speculation is as old as the hills. Whatever happens in the stock market today has happened before and will happen again.”

Marty Zweig

When Marty sadly passed away in 2013, I wrote a tribute to him as one of these bi-weekly missives, which long-time readers may remember.

Marty may be most famous for perfectly calling the Crash of ’87 on precisely the Friday night before that fateful Monday, October 19, 1987 (“Black Monday”). He did so on the legendary PBS show Wall $treet Week With Louis Rukeyser—a show I would join as a regular panelist 10 years later. Some readers (let’s just say of the more “seasoned” variety) might remember that prescient conversation between Marty and Lou; and thanks to YouTube, anyone can watch it.

Marty is also famous for coining two phrases that have become ingrained in many investors’ heads: “Don’t fight the Fed” and “Never fight the tape.” Here is what he had to say about both; some of which were in his bestselling 1986 book Winning on Wall Street:

“In the stock market, as with horse racing, money makes the mare go.”

“Big money is made in the stock market by being on the right side of major moves. I don’t believe in swimming against the tide. The idea is to get in harmony with the market. It’s suicidal to fight trends. They have a higher probability of continuing than not.”

“It’s OK to be wrong; it’s unforgivable to stay wrong.”

“I measure what’s going on, and I adapt to it. I try to get my ego out of the way. The market is smarter than I am, so I bend.”

“Patience is one of the most valuable attributes in investing.”

Louis Rukeyser

I miss Marty every day. I also miss Lou Rukeyser, who not only single-handedly introduced me to the world of financial media; but gave me some of the sagest advice I’ve ever received. During the preamble to the very first interview I did with Lou in 1997, he asked about my parents and whether they were “financial folks,” to which I responded no. He then took my hands in his and said, “when you come out on set in 15 minutes to have our interview, get them to understand what you’re talking about.” I try to live those words every single day in my role at Schwab.

Lou was also known for his humorous monologues every Friday night, including some of his most memorable quips:

“In Wall Street, the only thing that’s hard to explain is next week.”

“I never make a prediction that can be proved wrong within 24 hours.”

“The best way to keep money in perspective is to have some.”

But the one I’ll never forget is what Lou said on the Friday immediately following the Crash of ’87:

“It’s just your money. It’s not your life. The figures on a broker’s report mean little compared to that. The people who loved you a week ago still love you today.”

Quintessential investing books

Throughout those early years in my career, I read many a classic investing tome written by true legends. I try to pick each of them up from time to time to separate myself from the often-manic noise of the day-to-day reading and research with which we’re all bombarded. Though not an exhaustive list, they include:

A Random Walk Down Wall Street by Burton G. Malkiel, first published in 1973
The Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham, first published in 1949
The Money Game by Adam Smith (pseudonym for George Goodman), first published in 1976
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds by Charles Mackay, first published in 1841
Against the Gods by Peter L. Bernstein, first published in 1996

I could fill dozens of pages with memorable quotes from these spectacular books; but in keeping with the themes around speculation, here are some of my favorites:

Burton G. Malkiel

“Forecasts are difficult to make—particularly those about the future.”

“It’s not hard to make money in the market. What is hard to avoid is the alluring temptation to throw your money away on short, get-rich-quick speculative binges. It is an obvious lesson, but one frequently ignored.”

“…there are four factors that create irrational market behavior: overconfidence, biased judgments, herd mentality, and loss aversion.”

“Human nature likes order; people find it hard to accept the notion of randomness. No matter what the laws of chance might tell us, we search for patterns among random events wherever they might occur—not only in the stock market but even in interpreting sporting phenomena.”

Benjamin Graham

“Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

“Abnormally good or abnormally bad conditions do not last forever.”

“You will be much more in control, if you realize how much you are not in control.”

“The investor’s chief problem—and even his worst enemy—is likely to be himself.”

“…while enthusiasm may be necessary for great accomplishments elsewhere, on Wall Street it almost invariably leads to disaster.”

“An investment operation is one which, upon thorough analysis, promises safety of principal and an adequate return. Operations not meeting these requirements are speculative.”

“If the reason people invest is to make money, then in seeking advice they are asking others to tell them how to make money. That idea has some element of naivete.”

Adam Smith (George Goodman)

“If you don’t know who you are, this is an expensive place to find out.”

“The first thing you have to know is yourself. A man who knows himself can step outside himself and watch his own reactions like an observer.”

“When the Rothschilds got the word about the battle of Waterloo—in the movie it was by carrier pigeon—they didn’t rush down and buy British consols, the government bonds. They rushed in and sold, and then, in the panic, they bought.”

“The irony is that this is a money game and money is the way we keep score. But the real object of the Game is not money, but it is the playing of the Game itself. For the true players, you could take all the trophies away and substitute plastic beads or whales’ teeth; as long as there is a way to keep score, they will play.”

Charles Mackay

“Men, it has been well said, think in herds. It will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.”

“Let us not, in the pride of our superior knowledge, turn with contempt from the follies of our predecessors. The study of the errors into which great minds have fallen in the pursuit of truth can never be uninstructive.”

Peter L. Bernstein

“Risk and time are opposite sides of the same coin, for if there were no tomorrow there would be no risk. Time transforms risk, and the nature of risk is shaped by the time horizon: the future is the playing field.”

“Time matters most when decisions are irreversible. And yet many irreversible decisions must be made on the basis of incomplete information.”

“We are prisoners of the future because we will be ensnared by our past.”

“The information you have is not the information you want. The information you want is not the information you need. The information you need is not the information you can obtain. The information you can obtain costs more than you want to pay.”

“You never get poor by taking a profit.”

“Vast ills have followed a belief in certainty.”

Bob Farrell

During my 13 years at Zweig/Avatar, I was on the “buy side” managing money; and was the recipient of most of traditional Wall Street’s vast amount of “sell side” research. I was an admirer of many seasoned investment strategists during that time; and it planted the seed that would eventually grow into the role I’ve had at Schwab for more than two decades. In addition to Marty giving me Reminiscences of a Stock Operator to read; he also pointed me to the work of Bob Farrell; who was Merrill Lynch’s chief stock market analyst and senior investment advisor for 45 years; having studied fundamental analysis under (Benjamin) Gramm and (David L.) Dodd.

Bob is immortalized by his rules of investing that are still quoted widely by investment professionals—and ring as true today as ever:

Markets tend to return to the mean over time.

Excesses in one direction will lead to an opposite excess in the other direction.

There are no new eras—excesses are never permanent.

Exponential rapidly rising or falling markets usually go further than you think, but they do not correct by going sideways.

The public buys the most at the top and the least at the bottom.

Fear and greed are stronger than long-term resolve.

Markets are strongest when they are broad and weakest when they narrow to a handful of blue-chip names.

Bear markets have three stages—sharp down, reflexive rebound and a drawn-out fundamental downtrend.

When all the experts and forecasts agree—something else is going to happen.

Bull markets are more fun than bear markets

Charles Schwab, the company

I left Zweig/Avatar in mid-1999 to join U.S. Trust, which was acquired by Charles Schwab a short 10 months later. That acquisition was part of the evolution of Schwab away from its discount brokerage heritage to its expansion into a wealth management and brokerage powerhouse. With that acquisition, as I often say, I was figuratively adopted by the parent company, and my role was born.

Chuck Schwab, the man

Chuck has had an extraordinary influence on me personally, and my career. His optimism is infectious, and his character unrivaled in our business. One of my all-time favorite sentiments expressed by Chuck was about his people:

“I consider my ability to arouse enthusiasm among my people the greatest asset I possess, and the way to develop the best that is in a person is by appreciation and encouragement. There is nothing else that so kills the ambitions of a person as criticism from superiors.”

“I have yet to find the person, however great or exalted his station, who did not do better work and put forth greater effort under a spirit of approval than he would ever do under a spirit of criticism.”

I have worked under Chuck’s spirit of approval and encouragement for more than 20 years; for which I’ll be eternally grateful.

Two years ago, Chuck wrote a deeply personal memoir. In Invested Chuck tells a “remarkable story of a company succeeding by challenging norms and conventions through decades of change.” I had the great honor of hitting the road with Chuck on his book tour after it was published. During those conversations on stages around the country—as well as our many conversations over the past two decades—there are facets to his character and beliefs that have always guided me as I’ve traversed my path at Schwab.

One of our shared beliefs is the inability to time markets with any precision. Too many investors believe the key to success is knowing what’s going to happen in the market, and then positioning accordingly. But the reality is that it’s not what we know that makes us successful investors; it’s what we do. In Invested, Chuck wrote:

“If I had learned anything after years in the business, it was how little I could ever know about what the market would do tomorrow.”

I especially loved how Chuck closed the final chapter of Invested:

“Business is a creative process. You move forward into the unknowable future, try new things, make discoveries along the way, and repeat. It’s all about learning and growth. It is why I love it and the free market of ideas that enables it and makes so many great new things possible. I like to say business is organic, like life itself, ever changing. It is the human spirit of curiosity and creativity brought to life, and why I am ever optimistic about the future.”

Well said, Chuck.

Relevance

I’ve written a number of reports recently that detail a growing set of risks with which the market is facing. They include the aforementioned speculative froth at various points this year—concentrated in a rotating crop of non-traditional market segments, like meme stocks, SPACs, non-profitable ‘tech’ stocks, cryptocurrencies, IPOs, etc. Drawdowns this year in those areas have ranged from -30% to -80%. Perhaps because many of these “micro bubbles” sit outside traditional benchmark indexes like the S&P 500 helps explain the relative resiliency of the market.

Other risks include stretched valuations; monetary and fiscal policy concerns; slowing growth and not-yet-transitory inflation; and the recent/ongoing deterioration in the stock market’s “internals” (breadth). In fact, for all the cheering about the S&P 500 not having had even a 5% drawdown this year; it might surprise readers to know that 86% of the index’s constituents have had at least a 10% correction this year.

As highlighted above via the words of investment legends, investors should be cognizant of heightened risks. Heed the risk/reward benefits of diversification (across and within asset classes) and rebalancing. Try to divine whether there is a gap between your financial risk tolerance and your emotional risk tolerance. Those gaps can be surprisingly wide and often only discovered during tumultuous market periods.

“Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

-- Liz Ann Sonders

Wednesday, August 25, 2021

add low, trim high

With regard to rebalancing, it’s one of the most beneficial disciplines in that it forces us to do what we know we’re supposed to do — add low, trim high. Notice I adjusted that from the classic “buy low, sell high” adage; which can infer an all-or-nothing strategy. Frankly, investors should never think of investing as either “get in” or “get out.” That is gambling on moments in time; while investing should always be a disciplined process over time.

- Liz Ann Sonders

Tuesday, July 27, 2021

The Law of Fashion

The great philosopher John Locke brilliantly captured the way the world works. Little did he know that he would also explain how the stock market works, even though it barely existed when he came up with his philosophy. The stock market is driven by “the law of fashion, civil law and divine law.”

Law of fashion

We have participated in the stock market since 1980 and we know quite a bit of the history of the prior decades. Each decade seems to have its own law of fashion. This means a “general precept established by public opinion.” It is the heart and soul of what John Kenneth Galbraith called “financial euphoria.” In the 1960s, the space race encouraged excitement about “Go-Go” growth companies. In the early 1970s, it was a group of 50 stocks (the Nifty-Fifty) which seemed to grow consistently and were rewarded in the marketplace of investors with highly fashionable price-to-earnings (P/E) multiples.

By 1981, stocks had done horribly as inflation soared and fashion surrounded businesses which benefitted from inflation. Five of the six largest cap companies were oil stocks and energy made up 29.5% of the S&P 500 Index. Oil, real estate and gold enjoyed the favor coming from the “law of fashion.”

In 1998-2000, the Dotcom Bubble controlled what was fashionable in the aftermath of the establishment of the internet, capping an amazing decade of success. Energy got back on its horse from 2000-2011, as the financial crisis boiled and China’s growth dominated what was popular.

The last decade (2011-2020) has been the FAANG Era (Facebook (FB, Financial), Amazon (AMZN, Financial), Apple (AAPL, Financial), Netflix (NFLX, Financial) and Google/Alphabet (GOOG, Financial)(GOOGL, Financial)), as the dominant tech companies have reasserted themselves in the stock market. This is under the general precept that nothing can go wrong with them and how dependent we have all become on their products.

Civil law

Occasionally, the U.S. government decides to get involved in the stock market via “civil law.” The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 broke up Standard Oil in the early 1900s, regulated the railroads and the telephone behemoth (AT&T (T, Financial)), sued IBM (IBM, Financial) in the 1960s, Microsoft (MSFT, Financial) in the 1990s and is preparing to go after Amazon, Google, Apple, Facebook and others. Here is the chart of IBM in the aftermath of running into “civil law” in 1969, when the Justice Department sued them and sought to break them up:

We have a rule when it comes to civil law in the stock market. When Senator Elizabeth Warren and Senator Josh Hawley agree on something, expect there to be civil law problems for the targets of their jointly held ire. Did I forget to mention Lina Khan, the head of the Federal Trade Commission, who is coming after the FAANG companies?

Divine law

To us at Smead Capital Management, there are some divine laws which govern the stock market over long time periods.
  • Interest rates are like gravity to P/E ratios (Warren Buffett (Trades, Portfolio)).
  • Euphoric episodes end badly (Galbraith).
  • Cheap stocks outperform expensive stocks over long time periods (Benjamin Graham).
  • Performance is enhanced by buying extreme pessimism (John Templeton).
  • Every stock which goes up 10-fold had to double and quadruple first (Smead).
  • Young people who buy stocks on borrowed money lose (Edwin Lefevre-"Reminisces of a Stock Market Operator").
  • Most investors suffer stock market failure (Dalbar).
The goal of our work is to avoid getting stuck as fashion disappears. We have no urge for getting beat up by our companies suffering from civil law moving against them. We enjoy using these divine laws to run our portfolios. Thanks to John Locke, we hope to avoid stock market failure.

-- Smead Capital Management

Monday, May 17, 2021

Charlie Tian looks at Cathie Wood's fund

Starting this week, I will be writing a weekly column on the market. Over the years, I have put most of my effort into the technology side of GuruFocus, though I still wrote my book, "Invest Like a Guru." I have spent more time observing the market lately. I hope that by sharing my observations of the market, it will help our GuruFocus community. Please do follow me here on GuruFocus.com.

I cannot start this column by overlooking that the once red-hot ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK, Financial) dipped below $100 for the first time since last November. ARKK is now more than one-third below its peak of $156 a little over three months ago, back when its star manager, Cathie Wood, was everywhere on financial media and attracted a large group of followers into her funds. She was hailed by some as the new Warren Buffett (Trades, Portfolio).

If we look at ARKK's performance numbers today, it is still one of the best, if not the best, among all ETFs, mutual funds and hedge funds over the past 12-month, three-year and five-year periods. The chart below compares the performances of ARKK versus Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A, Financial)(BRK.B, Financial) over the past 12 months. ARKK still outperformed by more than 10%.

1392889215645167616.png

Unfortunately, the majority of the investors that own ARKK today are losing money because more than half of its assets flew into the fund over the past six months. In contrast, almost every one of the investors who bought Berkshire Hathaway over the past 12 months has made money.

That is the price you pay if you chase hot funds. Sometimes it is painful for the fund managers, too. They may have good track records, but they lost more money than they made.

This reminds me of Bruce Berkowitz (Trades, Portfolio), the manager of the Fairholme Fund (Trades, Portfolio). After his tremendous track record during the first decade of this century, he was named Morningstar Fund Manager of the Decade, was considered the new Buffett and had a large following on GuruFocus as well. Money poured into his fund. At the end of the first quarter of 2011, Fairholme Fund (Trades, Portfolio) had more than $20 billion under management. But with a few missteps with his stock picks and the headwind with value investing, most of those chasing the fund withdrew as they could not endure the loss. By 2018, Fairholme Fund (Trades, Portfolio)'s assets were less than $1 billion. Around 95% of the money was either lost or withdrawn. This is the history of the asset value in the Fairholme Fund (Trades, Portfolio).

1392895468207386624.png

The Cathie Wood phenomena is a lot more like the Janus Fund during the dotcom era of the 1990s. Heavily invested in technology stocks, Janus routinely led the list of the best mutual funds. Money poured in at the rate of $1 billion a day. Back then, $1 billion was a lot more money than it is today. Then the dotcom bubble burst, Janus Fund lost money in three consecutive years from 2000 to 2002 and ranked at the bottom of mutual funds. The investors who once were rushing into the funds were streaming out, and most of them lost money. The fund never bounced back.

Chasing hot funds never works. Sure, skill is needed in stock picking. That is why we have Warren Buffett (Trades, Portfolio). But most of the star managers became stars not because they are better at stock picking, but because they are the most aggressive person in their style of investing while that style has the wind at its back. But every once in a while, the direction of the wind changes. With the Covid-19 pandemic, technology stocks, especially those with hyper growth prospects, gained momentum and many saw their price multiplied in a matter of months. Cathie Wood owns a lot of them. About half of the stocks she owns are those of earningless hyper growth companies. She became the hero, but then the direction of the wind turned.

That was what happened to Janus Fund. This is what is happening to Cathie Wood, too.

I personally know a lot of people who bought ARKK. I surveyed them yesterday and every one of them lost money and about half of them sold at a loss. I wonder whether the size of ARKK will repeat that of Fairholme Fund (Trades, Portfolio) a decade ago.

But maybe it is time for Berkowitz's value approach to shine again. After more than a decade of underperformance and reaching the bottom at the second half of 2020, value stocks are coming back. It has outperformed since then, as shown in the chart below, which illustrate the difference in rolling five-year annualized return between Russell 1000 Value and Growth.

The pattern of the stock market from 2010 to 2020 looks a lot like what happened from 1990 to 2000. We know what happened to the Janus Fund. We have yet to see what will happen to Cathie Wood.

History does rhyme.

Wednesday, January 27, 2021

The GameStop Effect

(Reuters) - Retail traders chalked one up versus Wall Street on Wednesday as hedge funds took heavy losses on short positions in GameStop, and regulators and financial professionals called for more scrutiny of trading fueled by anonymous social media posts.

In the latest skirmish in a week-long battle between Wall Street and Main Street, funds sold long positions in stocks to pay for losses shorting Gamestop, contributing to a slide of more than 2% in Wall Street’s main indexes.[.N]

“We are moving to a world where ordinary folk have the same access as professionals and can come to the same conclusion or maybe the opposite,” technology investor Chamath Palihapitiya told CNBC. “The solution is more transparency on the institutional side, not less access for retail.”

The market turmoil caught the attention of the White House, with press secretary Jen Psaki saying President Joe Biden’s economic team - including Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen on her first full day on the job - was “monitoring the situation.”

Massachusetts state regulator William Galvin, called on NYSE to suspend GameStop for 30 days to allow a cooling-off period.

“This isn’t investing, this is gambling,” he said in an interview. “This is obviously contrived.”

Nasdaq chief Adena Friedman said exchanges and regulators should watch whether anonymous social media posts could be driving “pump and dump” schemes.

“If we see a significant rise in the chatter on social media ... and we also match that up against unusual trading activity, we will potentially halt that stock to allow ourselves to investigate the situation,” Friedman said on CNBC.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission said it was aware of the market volatility and working with fellow regulators to “assess the situation and review the activities of regulated entities, financial intermediaries, and other market participants.”

Reddit has not been contacted by authorities over stock surges driven by a message board on the platform, a spokeswoman said.

The war began when famed short seller Andrew Left of Citron Capital bet against GameStop and was met with a barrage of retail traders betting the other way.

Factbox: Stocks shunned by Wall Street surge as 'GameStop Effect' snowballs

White House monitoring situation involving GameStop, other firms

Citron has been a target for some on Reddit’s “Wallstreetbets” thread, where posts helped drive gains for several niche stocks.

Left said in a video post that Citron abandoned its bet against GameStop after the video game retailer’s value soared almost tenfold in a fortnight.

“I have respect for the market,” Left said in the post.

Melvin Capital Management closed out its short position in GameStop on Tuesday after taking a huge loss.

WINNERS AND LOSERS

Shares of GameStop surged 135% on Wednesday, bringing their gain since Jan. 12 to about 1,700% and ballooning its market capitalization to $24 billion.

U.S. shares of BlackBerry Ltd jumped 33%, bringing their gain in 2021 to 279%, while movie theater operator AMC surged 300% and is now up over 800% year to date.

Along with Finnish technology firm Nokia Oyj, those companies were among the most heavily traded, with Reddit threads humming with chatter about the stocks. Nokia said it was not aware of any reason for the continuing surge in its share price.

Such inflated stocks will eventually fall back to their fair value, predicted Ryan Detrick, senior market strategist at LPL Financial in Charlotte, North Carolina.

“It does have a David and Goliath feel, where the Reddit crowd is taking on the most shorted stocks by the largest hedge funds in the world and winning.”

BlackRock Inc, the world’s largest asset manager, could have made gains of about $2.4 billion on its investment in GameStop. Its share holdings amounted to roughly a 13% stake as of Dec. 31, 2020, a regulatory filing showed.

“It’s a dangerous game to play from both sides of the spectrum, whether you’re long or short,” said Matthew Keator, managing partner in wealth management firm the Keator Group in Lenox, Massachusetts.

“You get close enough to the fire you’re going to get burned ... it won’t matter what social media is cheering the stock on.”

According to research firm S3 Partners, total short interest in GameStop was $10.6 billion as of Wednesday. In the last seven days the short has increased by $117 million, or 1.1%, as the stock price surged.

Year-to-date, GameStop shorts have lost $19.15 billion, including $9.85 billion on Wednesday at a $285 share price, according to Ihor Dusaniwsky, S3’s managing director of predictive analytics.

“These large mark-to-market losses will be squeezing many existing shorts out of their positions, but we are still seeing new short sellers taking their place as they look to short at the top and ride a windfall of profits,” he said.

Long dismissed as “dumb money,” retail traders have made stocks move in ways that defy fundamental analysis. Global bets worth billions of dollars could be at risk as amateurs challenge bearish positions of influential funds.

The 20 small-cap Russell 2000 index companies with the biggest bearish bets against them have risen 60% on average so far this year, easily outperforming the market, a Reuters analysis of Refinitiv data shows.

Europe’s most-shorted stocks also saw big price swings on Wednesday.

Experts are debating whether these massive share moves should be considered ominous signs for the market.

Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian said the rise of retail investors is healthy, however.

“That’s the sentiment, the public doing what they feel has been done to them by institutions,” Ohanian said in a tweet on Wednesday.

Sunday, January 10, 2021

5 pieces of financial advice from Warren Buffett

“I will tell you how to become rich. Be fearful when others are greedy. Be greedy when others are fearful.” Most people chase what’s hot. As euphoria builds money pours in. Until it collapses. Buffett does exactly the opposite. He buys when most people are selling. And waits when most are buying. Incredibly difficult to do. And incredibly rewarding.

“Price is what you pay. Value is what you get. I like buying quality merchandise when it’s marked down.” Most people chase price. The higher the price the more money flows in. Until the value can’t sustain the price. Buffett chases value. Looks for investments priced under their worth. Then buys and waits for others to discover their value.

“I don’t look to jump over seven foot bars. I look for one foot bars I can step over.” Most people try to hit home-runs. They speculate on the next big hit. And keep striking out. Buffett instead invests to build wealth steadily. Rare home-runs. Lots of singles that win games.

“Successful investing takes time, discipline and patience.” Most people want to get rich quick. So they continually take long bets that frequently blow up. Buffett takes a long term view. He’s happy to build wealth over a lifetime rather than a year or decade.

“What we learn from history is that most people don’t learn from history.” Most people whether euphoric or depressed refuse to learn from those who were successful. And they pay the price. Buffett always learned from others. And reaped the rewards.

Saturday, January 09, 2021

move over Buffett?

"Move Over, Warren Buffett: This Is the Star Investor You Should Be Following."

So read the headline on a year-end article from retail investing advice site Motley Fool touting the performance of fund manager Cathie Wood. Variations on the "Buffett is done" theme have been around since at least the tech bubble, while the cult of star mutual-fund managers goes back to the 1960s. Such commentators have eventually eaten their words.

Not that Ms. Wood's performance is anything to sneeze at. Her largest exchange-traded fund, the ARK Innovation ETF, surged by almost 160% last year, growing assets 10-fold -- unprecedented inflows for an active fund of that type. She made concentrated bets on hot stocks such as Tesla, Roku, Square and biotechs boosted by the Covid-19 pandemic. An ARK Invest spokesperson wouldn't elaborate, but Ms. Wood told an interviewer last month that she expects to nearly triple unit holders' money over the next five years.

That is unlikely. In fact, similar star managers' performance has tended not only to be mean-reverting but actually worse-than-average after their runs end. Bill Miller, who famously beat the S&P 500 from 1991 through 2005, drawing huge inflows into Legg Mason Value Trust, spent the next few years as one of the worst fund managers in the country.

Come-uppances are especially harsh when a manager has ridden a hot category as Ms. Wood's firm has done. The fate of mutual-fund firm Janus is instructive: Between the end of 1998 and the end of March 2000, it went from being the 20th largest mutual-fund firm to the fifth largest -- an incredibly rapid ascent. It bet big on tech highfliers such as Cisco Systems and AOL. As the bubble burst, some of its funds lost two-thirds or more of their value.

Fund managers are often compared with dart-throwing monkeys. That might be too flattering for those who get the most attention. Hot funds' performance is often worse than random on the downside. A regularly updated study on the persistence of investor performance from S&P Dow Jones Indices shows that just 0.18% of domestic equity funds in the top quartile of performance in 2015 maintained that through each of the next four years -- less than half what one would have expected by pure chance. And of course most actively managed funds lag behind the index to which they are benchmarked because of fees and taxes.

This explains the amazing rise of index funds. It is mainly the supposed existence of stars such as Ms. Wood that has staved off an even bigger exodus from actively managed funds. Studies have shown, though, that actual stock-picking skill is very rare and is only provable after decades -- the sort of record that Mr. Buffett has established.

An academic study by Jerry Parwada and Eric Tan that examined the Morningstar Fund Managers of the Year between 1995 and 2012 showed that winners got big inflows but that their future performance was unremarkable. Indeed, one fund manager who later stumbled blamed the difficulty of deploying the extra cash for his poor results.

That makes sense. If one looks at Mr. Buffett, his results when he ran a modest partnership in the 1960s were far better than those of his huge, diversified conglomerate recently. But, unlike a share of Berkshire Hathaway, the dollar-weighted returns of a growing fund are worse than the stated results because more people are around for the stumble than the ascent.

Hot funds can burn you.

Thursday, January 07, 2021

Elon Musk

Elon Musk just became the richest person in the world, with a net worth of more than $185 billion.

Thursday’s increase in Tesla’s share price pushed Musk past Jeff Bezos, who had been the richest person since 2017 and is currently worth about $184 billion. Musk’s wealth surge over the past year marks the fastest rise to the top of the rich list in history — and is a dramatic financial turnaround for the famed entrepreneur who just 18 months ago was in the headlines for Tesla’s rapid cash burn and his personal leverage against the company’s stock.

Musk started 2020 worth about $27 billion, and was barely in the top 50 richest people.

Tesla’s rocketing share price — which has increased more than ninefold over the past year — along with his generous pay package have added more than $150 billion to his net worth.

Meanwhile, Amazon’s share price has remained more subdued due to the potential for increased regulation from Washington.

Elon Musk passed Warren Buffett in July to become the seventh-richest person. In November, Musk raced past Bill Gates to become the second-richest person. Musk has gained more wealth over the past 12 months than Bill Gates’ entire net worth of $132 billion.

Tesla’s shares closed Thursday at $816.04, up nearly 8%. The company’s market value has grown to more than $760 billion.

Wednesday, December 09, 2020

Mohnish Pabrai

[12/14/20] Being an investor is a continual learning process. The only way one can keep up with the investment environment is to change with the times, learn about different subjects and adapt to the changing environment.

There are many examples of successful investors who've needed to make these changes to stay relevant. One is Mohnish Pabrai (Trades, Portfolio). In a recent speech to the UCLA Student Investment Fund on Nov. 5, Pabrai explained how his investment strategy has adapted over the past few years.

A changing style

Pabrai started off as a deep value investor. When he started his hedge fund around 20 years ago, he focused on finding deeply discounted securities, buying them at a fraction of their net worth and then holding the stocks until the discount between intrinsic value and the market price had narrowed. As the value investor explained in his recent speech:

"I was always looking -- for the last 20 years -- for discounted pies. I didn't really care whether the pie grew or not. My take was that if I bought a business for 40 cents or 50 cents on the dollar, and I've always implicitly assumed that market efficiency would kick in in two or three years. So if I'm correct that a business is worth a dollar and I'm buying it for 50 cents, and I sell it for 90 cents and that convergence takes place in two or three years, it's a very nice rate of return in the 20s."

This "very nice" rate of return, he explained, removed the need to find high-quality compounder style businesses.

However, as he went on to explain, there were two problems with this approach: the fact that "you've got to keep finding the next one and the next one" and "taxes."

A much better approach, he observed, would be to find high-quality businesses and sit on them for decades. But this was not the way "Mohnish is wired," the value investor explained to his audience.

"He is unable to pay up for great businesses," Pabrai added. Other investors are more willing to pay up, but "I know Mohnish and Mohnish is just not wired that way."

This is a remarkable statement because it shows the need to understand our own qualities as investors. Lots of different investment strategies achieve positive results, but there's no point in following a process if you're not comfortable with it. This realization won't occur overnight. It requires emotional intelligence and experience to know what you are comfortable with, and more importantly, what you're not comfortable with.

Rather than pursuing an investment style he was not happy with, Pabrai took the best of both the quality and value methods and merged them into something he was happy with:

"So I am limited to a universe where a compounder is maybe not recognized, or it has hit a temporary hiccup or something where the valuation is really cheap, but there is a genuinely long runway for growth ahead. Instead of just getting off that train when it looks fully priced, which is what I did many times in the past, the idea is to stay on the train and only get off the train when it gets so egregious."

Pabrai explained that he had made this mistake several times in the past, which was part of the reason why his strategy changed. He had sold good companies too early and moved on to other businesses that have not been so successful. This was one of his main lessons of 2020, he told his audience. But with "20 to 35 years" of life left in him, he added, it was not too late to change course.

[12/10/14] Mohnish Pabrai’s long-only equity fund has returned a cumulative 517% net to investors vs. 43% for the S&P 500 Index since inception in 2000.  That’s outperformance of 474 percentage points or 1103 percent.

Pabrai is a classic value investor in the tradition of Warren Buffett, Charlie Munger, Seth Klarman and Joel Greenblat.

Like Buffett, Pabrai looks at a stock not as a piece of paper but as the ownership of a business.  He has no interest in a company that looks ten percent undervalued.  He is angling to make five times his money in a few years.  If he doesn’t think the opportunity is blindingly obvious, he passes.  This requires him to apply his X-Ray vision to the fundamentals, and weigh the downside risk (the margin of safety) vs. the upside potential (the moat) at a given price.  His mantra: Heads I win, tails I don’t lose much.

Next, Pabrai practices patience.  He takes Charlie Munger’s admonition to heart that money is made not in the buying or selling but in the waiting.  As far as I am aware, he has not made a single new investment in 2013.  He says that if he can find a couple of investment ideas a year, that’s plenty.  His current preference is to keep a cash store of between 10%-20%.  This seems like a tremendous drag for a fund posting numbers like his, but he is really biding his time for a distressed situation to come along when he can deploy this trove at the valuation he wants.  During the next crisis, when everyone is jamming the exits, he will go all in.

Once you start purchasing stocks, Pabrai says the next  step is to closely examine every trade that doesn’t work, and figure out what went wrong.  Let me pause right here, because this is key to his whole method.

There is nothing more tempting that to sweep mistakes under the rug.  Denial is one of our top defense mechanisms.  If you are lucky, these trades come to haunt your sleep like Marley’s ghost.  If you are unlucky, you repress them forever.

Due to his background in engineering, Pabrai does not gloss over mistakes.  Investing is a field where you can have a high error rate (buying something you shouldn’t have, selling something you shouldn’t have, not buying something you should have, not selling something you should have) and still be successful.  He takes as a given that mistakes are inevitable.  The point is to learn from them so they are not repeated.  A major portion of his annual meeting is devoted to publicly analyzing investments where he lost money for his partners.  Lately these errors are becoming harder to find, so he has been reduced to talking about investments that didn’t fare as well as expected.

[Looking at dataroma, Pabrai has 8 stocks in his portfolio with over 99% in 4 stocks: ZINC, BAC, C, PKX.  Hmm.  Maybe I should buy more C?]

[11/28/14] "Forbes: So summing up in terms of what do you think do you bring to value investing that others perhaps don’t, that give you a unique edge?

Pabrai: I think the biggest edge would be attitude. So you know, Charlie Munger likes to say that you don’t make money when you buy stocks. And you don’t make money when you sell stocks. You make money by waiting. And so the biggest, the single biggest advantage a value investor has is not IQ; it’s patience and waiting. Waiting for the right pitch and waiting for many years for the right pitch.

FROM: Forbes Transcript: Mohnish Pabrai (Trades, Portfolio) 04/12/2010

Sunday, October 25, 2020

average investor's returns

What's the craziest statistic about personal finance?

One that’s mind blowing.

The average investor’s return on investments is about a 1/3 of the average return on investments. Yeah, I’ll give you a moment.

Investors today can trade on line for free. They have access to thousands of research reports. They can buy and sell instantly. They can tune into financial news 24/7.

Yet, the U.S. stock market has averaged around 9 – 10% return per year over the long haul. And during those same periods investors have averaged around 1/3 of that.

How can that possibly be?

It’s because the average investor chases performance. The stock market makes new highs and investors pour money in. Stock market crashes and investors bail out and wait until it makes new highs again.

Buying high and selling low. A fool proof formula for destroying wealth.

And many do the same thing with investments. A hot new investment screams towards the sky so they put everything into it. Then it crashes to earth incinerating.

So what’s the antidote?

Something the average investor simply isn’t wired to do. Do the opposite of what you instinctly feel and see most other investors doing.

Because if you do what everyone else is doing you’ll get what everyone else is getting.

As I’ve heard said, “Human nature is a failed investor.”

Think about it. When our ancestors were hunter gatherers they chased performance. They all congregated at the same place on the river where someone was catching fish. They all hunted in the same place where someone got game.

It’s how we’re wired. And it worked.

Except in investing. Because by the time a new investment is screaming up and popular it’s about to run out of fuel.

And by the time the stock market is bouncing off new lows and people are liquidating it’s getting ready to make a run up.

So how do you do this?

It’s tough and frankly at times gut wrenching. But accomplishing it is the key to long term wealth. And understanding it is the first step.

Though, people will think that’s crazy.

You can build wealth but only as you first understand what destroys it.

-- Doug Armey, September 29, Successful entrepreneur, investor and financial consultant